Apache Hadoop vs Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
2,630 views|2,223 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
598 views|475 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Hadoop and Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Hadoop vs. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"​​Data ingestion: It has rapid speed, if Apache Accumulo is used.""The tool's stability is good.""One valuable feature is that we can download data.""What comes with the standard setup is what we mostly use, but Ambari is the most important.""The most valuable feature is scalability and the possibility to work with major information and open source capability.""Hadoop is extensible — it's elastic.""Apache Hadoop can manage large amounts and volumes of data with relative ease, which is a feature that is beneficial.""Two valuable features are its scalability and parallel processing. There are jobs that cannot be done unless you have massively parallel processing."

More Apache Hadoop Pros →

"It is not a pricey product compared to other data warehouse solutions.""​It has allowed fast daily loads and analysis of millions of rows of data, which eventually moved to near real-time.​""Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse integrates beautifully with other Microsoft ecosystem products.""We can store the data in a data lake for a very low cost.""The UI is very simple and functional for my clients, most of the clients that use the solution are not experts.""Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse provides good firewall processing in terms of response time.""Data collection and reporting are valuable features of the solution.""I like Data Warehouse's data integrity features. Data integrity is what databases are made for as opposed to spreadsheets."

More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Pros →

Cons
"In certain cases, the configurations for dealing with data skewness do not make any sense.""The solution is not easy to use. The solution should be easy to use and suitable for almost any case connected with the use of big data or working with large amounts of data.""From the Apache perspective or the open-source community, they need to add more capabilities to make life easier from a configuration and deployment perspective.""The stability of the solution needs improvement.""It would be helpful to have more information on how to best apply this solution to smaller organizations, with less data, and grow the data lake.""The key shortcoming is its inability to handle queries when there is insufficient memory. This limitation can be bypassed by processing the data in chunks.""Hadoop's security could be better.""The upgrade path should be improved because it is not as easy as it should be."

More Apache Hadoop Cons →

"The only issue with the product is that the process is very slow when we have a huge amount of data.""Some compatibility issues occur during deployment, so we need to build the product from scratch for some features.""I would like the tool to support different operating systems.""They need to incorporate a machine learning engine.""It could offer more development across the solution.""I would like to see better visualization features.""The product does not have all of the features that the native products have.""The solution is expensive and has room for improvement."

More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Do take into consider that data storage and compute capacity scale differently and hence purchasing a "boxed" / 'all-in-one" solution (software and hardware) might not be the best idea."
  • "​There are no licensing costs involved, hence money is saved on the software infrastructure​."
  • "This is a low cost and powerful solution."
  • "The price of Apache Hadoop could be less expensive."
  • "If my company can use the cloud version of Apache Hadoop, particularly the cloud storage feature, it would be easier and would cost less because an on-premises deployment has a higher cost during storage, for example, though I don't know exactly how much Apache Hadoop costs."
  • "We don't directly pay for it. Our clients pay for it, and they usually don't complain about the price. So, it is probably acceptable."
  • "The price could be better. Hortonworks no longer exists, and Cloudera killed the free version of Hadoop."
  • "We just use the free version."
  • More Apache Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I think the program is well-priced compared to the other offerings that are out in the market."
  • "Microsoft has an agreement with the government in our country, so our customers get their licensing costs from the Ministry. Whenever we work with any government, company, or government institute, which is mainly what we are doing, that license comes directly from the Ministry of Technology and Information."
  • "All the features that we use do not require any additional subscription or yearly fees."
  • "Technical support is an additional fee and is expensive."
  • "The solution's pricing is fairly decent for organizations with huge data sizes."
  • "The tool could be expensive if we need to manage a lot of data."
  • "They offer an annual subscription. The pricing depends on the size of the environments."
  • More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Tools like Apache Hadoop are knowledge-intensive in nature. Unlike other tools in the market currently, we cannot understand knowledge-intensive products straight away. To use Apache Hadoop, a person… more »
    Top Answer:Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse provides good firewall processing in terms of response time.
    Top Answer:They offer an annual subscription. The pricing depends on the size of the environments.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, the product requires rolling back to its previous version during a software update. This particular area could be enhanced.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 34 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    2,630
    Comparisons
    2,223
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    532
    Rating
    8.0
    8th
    out of 34 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    598
    Comparisons
    475
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    379
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft PDW, SQL Server Data Warehouse, Microsoft SQL Server Parallel Data Warehouse, MS Parallel Data Warehouse
    Learn More
    Overview
    The Apache Hadoop project develops open-source software for reliable, scalable, distributed computing. The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage. Rather than rely on hardware to deliver high-availability, the library itself is designed to detect and handle failures at the application layer, so delivering a highly-available service on top of a cluster of computers, each of which may be prone to failures.

    The traditional structured relational data warehouse was never designed to handle the volume of exponential data growth, the variety of semi-structured and unstructured data types, or the velocity of real time data processing. Microsoft's SQL Server data warehouse solution integrates your traditional data warehouse with non-relational data and it can handle data of all sizes and types, with real-time performance.

    Sample Customers
    Amazon, Adobe, eBay, Facebook, Google, Hulu, IBM, LinkedIn, Microsoft, Spotify, AOL, Twitter, University of Maryland, Yahoo!, Cornell University Web Lab
    Auckland Transport, Erste Bank Group, Urban Software Institute, NJVC, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Comms Service Provider25%
    Hospitality Company6%
    Consumer Goods Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    University6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Healthcare Company18%
    Pharma/Biotech Company12%
    Hospitality Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Insurance Company7%
    University6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Hadoop vs. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Hadoop vs. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Hadoop is ranked 5th in Data Warehouse with 32 reviews while Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is ranked 8th in Data Warehouse with 32 reviews. Apache Hadoop is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Apache Hadoop writes "A file system for data collection that contains needed information and files". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse writes "An easy to setup tool that allows its users to write stored procedure, making it a scalable product". Apache Hadoop is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Oracle Exadata, Snowflake and Teradata, whereas Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is most compared with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Oracle Exadata, SAP BW4HANA, VMware Tanzu Greenplum and Snowflake. See our Apache Hadoop vs. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse report.

    See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.

    We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.