We performed a comparison between Appian and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The product's most valuable feature is the low code aspect of development. We can develop an end-to-end VPN solution using a single platform."
"Appian is easy to install and set up, and it does not come out with your audit. It has accessible process orchestration and process management. With Appian, the time to market is much faster."
"Technical support is quite responsive."
"It's a stable product."
"The solution has a lot of strong features for the financial industry, it is very easy to use."
"The low code functionality and being able to get applications faster to customers or to the market are valuable."
"Another advantage of this tool is its reports and records. You can maintain dashboards, layouts. If you with a Java solution, it takes six months time. If you use this tool, you can finish in one or one and a half months' time."
"What stands out are the speed of the product, the quick, easy development, and visual diagramming."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"Even though the company has made great improvements in online documentation, featuring rich material which includes case studies of real-life use cases, the material could definitely be better in quality and coverage of use cases."
"Something I would like to see improved is an SQL database connection."
"It is difficult to set up the on-premise version."
"There should be more flexibility for the developers to choose the look and feel of the UI. They should have a better ability to design their widgets and customize them with different colors, shapes, and sizes. That is a limitation that could be improved upon."
"There are some restrictions with respect to using external components within Appian. So, for example, if we do not have a particular feature available, there's a long cycle of getting approvals and all of that. That does not offer flexibility, which definitely can be improved on."
"Architecture of product and scalabiility issues."
"If we could calculate the amount of data that will be realized, it would help us a lot."
"Appian is easy to set up, but JBoss is complex. JBoss is the application server for running Appian."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business Process Management (BPM). Appian is rated 8.4, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.