We compared Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response and CrowdStrike Falcon Complete based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
The Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response system is praised for its comprehensive threat detection abilities, proactive approach to security, and expert guidance. On the other hand, CrowdStrike Falcon Complete is appreciated for its advanced threat detection capabilities, quick incident response times, and proactive protection against cyber threats. Key differences include Arctic Wolf's user-friendly interface and CrowdStrike's extensive visibility into network activities. CrowdStrike's efficient deployment process is highlighted, while Arctic Wolf's customer service and support receive high praise. Areas of improvement for Arctic Wolf involve better integration and customizable reporting options, while CrowdStrike users seek enhancements in system compatibility and scanning efficiency. Ultimately, both solutions provide positive returns on investment, improved security, and efficient incident response times for users.
Features: Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is valued for its comprehensive threat detection, real-time monitoring, proactive security approach, and user-friendly interface. CrowdStrike Falcon Complete stands out for its advanced threat detection, extensive network visibility, and seamless integration with existing security tools.
Pricing and ROI: In terms of setup cost, users have provided feedback on their experience with Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, while CrowdStrike Falcon Complete offers a fair pricing structure with reasonable setup costs. The licensing process for CrowdStrike is straightforward, ensuring ease of use for customers., Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response offers a positive ROI with successful outcomes, improved security, and reduced risks. Users value its effective and efficient service. CrowdStrike Falcon Complete also provides a highly positive ROI with significant returns and improved security. Users praise its effectiveness in preventing cyber threats and value its comprehensive monitoring and real-time alerts. Both solutions offer cost-effective ROI.
Room for Improvement: Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response users have mentioned the need for better integration with existing security tools, more customizable reporting options, and improvements in user interface and ease of use. They also expressed the desire for faster response times and proactive threat hunting capabilities. CrowdStrike Falcon Complete users have identified areas for improvement in system compatibility, response time, scanning efficiency, and visibility into threats. They highlighted the challenges with compatibility and the importance of faster response times. Users also emphasized the need for improved scanning efficiency and accuracy, as well as enhanced visibility into identified threats.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response highlight that the time required for deployment, setup, and implementation varied among users. Some reported spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while others mentioned a week for both. In comparison, the reviews for CrowdStrike Falcon Complete emphasize the need to consider the context in which terms like deployment, setup, and implementation are used. For example, if a user mentioned spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, both timeframes should be taken into account. However, if a user mentioned needing a week for both deployment and setup, these terms likely refer to the same time period., The customer service of Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is highly appreciated for prompt and efficient assistance, while CrowdStrike Falcon Complete's customer service is praised for being exceptionally helpful, responsive, and efficient.
The summary above is based on 56 interviews we conducted recently with Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response and CrowdStrike Falcon Complete users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The case interface is Binary Defense MDR's most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is reviewing tickets and the notes added by technicians."
"With Binary Defense, we don't just get an alert, but also a detailed rundown of why they're alerting us on it. They tell us what was executed, or the username, script, or IP. That way, we're not wasting time investigating."
"The best part about Binary Defense MDR is that it runs on everything, and they keep an eye on things 24/7."
"One of the main benefits of Binary Defense MDR is the ability to easily meet with their support team to discuss any issues we encounter."
"The biggest aspect for us is that they are able to conform to our environment and utilize our tools. That way, we still maintain ownership of all the data and access to the applications, and we never lose control of the ability to run the solution ourselves if we need to."
"Binary Defense has a human service department that provides live monitoring for our systems."
"The most valuable features are the SIEM and the ticketing function; the latter is very smooth and easy to read and understand. We don't have any issues looking at the ticketing information when we're trying to identify what's going on."
"The integration between Cisco AMPs and the Windows servers is most valuable. So, they can also sandbox machines on which they see something suspicious."
"The visibility into our endpoints is huge."
"The agents give pretty good visibility into what is happening at the endpoint."
"Security protection is the best feature of this product."
"The product provides integrations with several different SaaS applications."
"Having quarterly meetings with the team to review the last 90 days and determine what if any changes need to be made."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its ease of implementation."
"They have a portal where you can evaluate and mitigate any vulnerabilities that you and your network might have."
"It has good visibility, works well, and it is fast."
"Its ease of use is valuable. Nothing is left to you."
"Falcon's threat intel is strong, and the solution allows our customers to automate their site intelligence. We can integrate Falcon X with the other platforms we use, like FireEye, Insight, Cybertech, and Kaspersky."
"Its IOCs alerting mechanism is good. I think it is AI based and categorizes behaviors which are unusual."
"We found the initial setup to be quick and easy for the most part."
"What I found most valuable in CrowdStrike Falcon Complete is that it has a lot of monitoring dashboards and use cases, and I saw that it's a very good product, but my company has only tested it, so it's not been used for real use cases. My company hasn't tested the complete license for CrowdStrike Falcon Complete, so the team hasn't checked the open fiber rooms for zero-day attacks, IOAs and IOCs, or any indicators of fraudulent activities. I was also amazed at the solution and its licensing. My company did a competitive analysis of many EDR solutions, but it went with CrowdStrike Falcon Complete. It's one of the top-rated solutions on CyberRatings as well."
"The main valuable features are feasibility, ease of deployment, and that it's all based in the cloud. I like that it is gradually updated and that the detection rate is higher than that of other endpoint solutions. There are fewer loopholes."
"We've seen a tremendous improvement since implementing CrowdStrike Falcon. In the past few years, we were exposed to 30 different attacks, but now our environment is completely monitored, and everything is detected. It catches threats and attacks before they occur."
"I would like to get more reports from Binary Defense about what they're blocking."
"We found a couple of bugs in the user interface."
"If I were shopping for an MDR solution today, I would not only look for a company that has the ability to alert, detect, and remediate, but also the ability to integrate vulnerability management. That's a big thing that they're lacking today."
"Binary Defense MDR could be even better with additional features, like automatic scans and file quarantine."
"We found that an earlier version of the agent had high memory usage and that was a bit concerning, but we raised the concern with their support team and they immediately replied that they had noticed the same thing and had a candidate fix already available... it totally fixed the issue."
"The current reporting system could benefit from improvement."
"The most significant area for improvement is in support for non-English speakers; we're a global organization, so many of our users are not English speakers, which can make interacting with them a challenge. There's no Chinese language support, so we must rely on what we can do with the internet. We don't expect Binary Defense to build a language staff, but details can get lost in translation when we assume the whole world speaks English."
"The only area I see for improvement with Binary Defense is their service portal. It could benefit from some enhancements."
"It would be great if the whole process of determining vendor risk could be simplified by Arctic Wolf."
"I would like to see them build the ability to co-sell an EDR platform, manage an EDR or manage the actual response, potentially from the issues that are coming up from the security risks."
"I can't think of any specific features that they need to add at the moment. As long as they continue to develop new solutions to support different operating systems and technologies, we are satisfied with their service. We appreciate the effort they put into adding new features and functionality to their service and believe they are doing a great job in providing us with all the necessary tools and resources to stay secure."
"We need an easier way to audit and act on agents."
"If you are not in the security field, this can be difficult to figure out from time to time."
"We get a lot of false alarms, but that's because they don't know our network in detail. I think that could be alleviated if we told them more about our network so they could create rules to skip some of those things."
"In the future, I would like to see a summary report."
"Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response's analysis and remediation parts could be improved. It's not bad, but it needs improvement."
"I would love for the threat intelligence part to be more globalized to provide a tailored response to types of malware and ransomware that are trending in other regions. For example, they can add a feature to tell us that there are separate attacks in South Asia or East Asia occurring at these times, so we can supply those things to our environment and protect ourselves."
"The technical support is good. However, the technical support is outsourced to India which causes some language barriers. I am not sure if this is still an issue, they might have allotted more suitable representatives."
"The documentation that they had for the use of their API's was not very helpful."
"The support from CrowdStrike Falcon Complete is very fast. The support could improve if it was in the French language."
"The downside that we see with CrowdStrike is that it is not part of a broader ecosystem. It is an endpoint product. They don't sell firewalls or a broader cybersecurity ecosystem. Some of the behavioral detections could be more robust. It does a good job of stopping common tools and techniques, but when it comes to using Windows utilities, such as PowerShell, etc, it doesn't stop them. These are some of the things where we have been able to get past it. An argument there can be that these are administrative tools, not malware, so maybe it is not its job to stop it, but we see some of the competitive products doing a very good job of detecting behaviors as opposed to malware."
"Their endpoint solution is excellent. But I would like to see them improve their HDR, as well as their DLP (Data Loss Prevention)."
"The improvements needed for CrowdStrike Falcon Complete are in the way the agent updates. The overall management of endpoints needs to be better."
"The initial setup was slightly complex although it's an easier solution."
More Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is ranked 2nd in Managed Detection and Response (MDR) with 17 reviews while CrowdStrike Falcon Complete is ranked 1st in Managed Detection and Response (MDR) with 74 reviews. Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is rated 9.2, while CrowdStrike Falcon Complete is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response writes "Very good support, excellent visibility, and useful security bulletins". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon Complete writes "Great next-generation antivirus with breach warranty and good intrusion protection". Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is most compared with Huntress, Red Canary MDR, Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting, SentinelOne Vigilance and Adlumin Security Operations Platform, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon Complete is most compared with Blackpoint Cyber MDR, Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR, Sophos MDR, Red Canary MDR and Huntress. See our Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Complete report.
See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.
We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
