We performed a comparison between Mobius Content Services Platform and OpenText Extended ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."This solution has improved our organization by providing a central repository for business data with control over sensitive data."
"It provides a single pane of glass for delivering content from multiple repositories. It is also highly recommended because of the ease of use when it comes to searching and retrieving from multiple repositories simultaneously."
"The ability to add metadata and use that to categorize information is a valuable feature of OpenText Extended ECM."
"Being able to search is valuable. Its search is pretty powerful. We are able to search for specific text, and it points us to the document that has that text. That is pretty powerful."
"Most of our customers are very fond of the upgraded smart user interface."
"The solution's automatic document numbering, state management, and process flow are very useful features to go through the full cycle of the document."
"Simplicity to roll out, features available, customization options."
"It's a very good solution."
"Retention is useful. I have been pleased with the search functionality and the extensibility for tying it into integrations with other systems and building workflows on top of it."
"An SAP user can store documents directly into OpenText without a connector."
"Sales and service need to be more consistent."
"The setup and the support could be improved when it comes to populating the reports from a mainframe environment."
"A dashboard with information would be nice to see."
"User interface needs improvement (at least in the version we are using, desktop client)."
"The tool's documentation is not proper and has missing information like steps."
"The annotation tool needs improvement. In other tools, such as Hyland OnBase, you can easily do annotation. You can easily merge documents. You can easily compare documents, whereas with OpenText, it seems to be a challenge."
"Initially there can be stability issues due to unknown factors such as usage of the system, quantity of documents ingested, load during peak hours."
"OpenText Extended ECM's user interface could be improved."
"We had some issues with scalability in the production. So, I would rate it a five out of ten."
"The architecture needs improvement, as it's complex."
More Mobius Content Services Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mobius Content Services Platform is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 3 reviews while OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews. Mobius Content Services Platform is rated 7.4, while OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Mobius Content Services Platform writes "Time from creation to access is much better, as reports are immediately available upon generation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". Mobius Content Services Platform is most compared with IBM ECM, IBM FileNet, SharePoint and Alfresco, whereas OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
