We performed a comparison between Mobius Content Services Platform and OpenText Extended ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."This solution has improved our organization by providing a central repository for business data with control over sensitive data."
"It provides a single pane of glass for delivering content from multiple repositories. It is also highly recommended because of the ease of use when it comes to searching and retrieving from multiple repositories simultaneously."
"We can configure the solution with any industry's products per customer requirements."
"The ability to add metadata and use that to categorize information is a valuable feature of OpenText Extended ECM."
"We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where everything is. Being able to use that on top of the Content Server was a big help."
"Being able to search is valuable. Its search is pretty powerful. We are able to search for specific text, and it points us to the document that has that text. That is pretty powerful."
"WebReports has a lot of capabilities that offer good opportunities to customize the applications the way we want to."
"We use Core Share to share documents with external auditors or with vendors, and that prevents them from being able to get into the whole system. It is useful."
"Scalability is great. We can extend areas horizontally and vertically."
"It's a very good solution."
"The setup and the support could be improved when it comes to populating the reports from a mainframe environment."
"Sales and service need to be more consistent."
"The solution should work better with partners and be more developer-friendly."
"We are looking for new, advanced UI features. Currently, the UI does not look great."
"OpenText Extended ECM's user interface could be improved."
"User interface needs improvement (at least in the version we are using, desktop client)."
"The architecture needs improvement, as it's complex."
"When it comes to addressing complex use cases, three or four years ago, we ended up purchasing an additional OpenText product called AppWorks because we started to run into some limitations with the workflow that can be done in Extended ECM. It was a little limiting, so we ended up getting another product."
"Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important."
"A dashboard with information would be nice to see."
More Mobius Content Services Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mobius Content Services Platform is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 3 reviews while OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews. Mobius Content Services Platform is rated 7.4, while OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Mobius Content Services Platform writes "Time from creation to access is much better, as reports are immediately available upon generation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". Mobius Content Services Platform is most compared with IBM ECM, IBM FileNet, SharePoint and Alfresco, whereas OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Alfresco and OpenText Content Manager.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.