We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare AttackIQ vs. XM Cyber HaXM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AttackIQ Logo
2,177 views|1,213 comparisons
XM Cyber HaXM Logo
892 views|609 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
542,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me.
Top Answer: I can't think of any features that are lacking just now. It does everything I need it to do. I don't have too much experience with the solution. I need more time to really study the solution to see if… more »
Top Answer: I primarily use the solution for my own personal projects. It's a BAS - Breach and Attack Simulation.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
2,177
Comparisons
1,213
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
366
Rating
7.0
Views
892
Comparisons
609
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

The AttackIQ platform enables continuous validation that your security controls, processes and people are working as intended and delivering ROI. It seamlessly integrates into any existing network, delivering immediate visibility into your security program so you can uncover gaps in coverage, identify misconfigurations, and quickly prioritize remediation efforts.

HaXM by XM Cyber is the first breach and attack simulation (BAS) platform to simulate, validate and remediate attackers’ paths to your critical assets 24×7. HaXM’s automated purple teaming aligns red and blue teams to provide the full realistic APT experience on one hand while delivering vital prioritized remediation on the other. Addressing real user behavior and exploits, the full spectrum of scenarios is aligned to your organization’s own network to expose blind spots and is executed using the most up-to-date attack techniques safely, without affecting network availability and user experience.

Offer
Learn more about AttackIQ
Learn more about XM Cyber HaXM
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Ovum, Plymouth Rock Corporation
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider29%
Financial Services Firm6%
Wholesaler/Distributor5%

AttackIQ is ranked 2nd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 1 review while XM Cyber HaXM is ranked 7th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). AttackIQ is rated 7.0, while XM Cyber HaXM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AttackIQ writes "Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up". On the other hand, AttackIQ is most compared with Cymulate, Verodin, SafeBreach, Picus Security and Guardicore Infection Monkey, whereas XM Cyber HaXM is most compared with Cymulate, Pentera, Verodin, SafeBreach and Picus Security.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.