We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Earn 20 points
The AttackIQ platform enables continuous validation that your security controls, processes and people are working as intended and delivering ROI. It seamlessly integrates into any existing network, delivering immediate visibility into your security program so you can uncover gaps in coverage, identify misconfigurations, and quickly prioritize remediation efforts.
HaXM by XM Cyber is the first breach and attack simulation (BAS) platform to simulate, validate and remediate attackers’ paths to your critical assets 24×7. HaXM’s automated purple teaming aligns red and blue teams to provide the full realistic APT experience on one hand while delivering vital prioritized remediation on the other. Addressing real user behavior and exploits, the full spectrum of scenarios is aligned to your organization’s own network to expose blind spots and is executed using the most up-to-date attack techniques safely, without affecting network availability and user experience.
AttackIQ is ranked 2nd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 1 review while XM Cyber HaXM is ranked 7th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). AttackIQ is rated 7.0, while XM Cyber HaXM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AttackIQ writes "Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up". On the other hand, AttackIQ is most compared with Cymulate, Verodin, SafeBreach, Picus Security and Guardicore Infection Monkey, whereas XM Cyber HaXM is most compared with Cymulate, Pentera, Verodin, SafeBreach and Picus Security.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.