Compare Aurea CX Messenger vs. VMware RabbitMQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Aurea CX Messenger? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, VMware and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2020.
442,764 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution offers excellent stability."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros »

"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network.""The security is great.""The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."

More VMware RabbitMQ Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons »

"I was struggling with installing a few things. It would be good if was somewhat similar to RedHat. There should be more documentation regarding installation troubleshooting.""Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster.""When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."

More VMware RabbitMQ Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."

More VMware RabbitMQ Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
442,764 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution offers excellent stability.
Top Answer: The licensing costs on a yearly basis are around $200,000. There are no additional costs besides the licensing fees. For example, you do not have to pay extra for technical support, etc.
Top Answer: The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.
Top Answer: The security is great.
Top Answer: Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster. It would be great if they could improve that.
Top Answer: I primarily use the solution for research purposes. I've utilized it for my academic studies for comparing HTTPS protocols. RabbitMQ supported the protocols I needed and I've read also that it's one… more »
Ranking
Views
1,673
Comparisons
791
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
495
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
33,267
Comparisons
25,700
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
320
Avg. Rating
7.3
Popular Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQRabbitMQ by Pivotal, Rabbit, RabbitMQ
Learn
Aurea
VMware
Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

  • RabbitMQ is the most popular open source message broker, with more than 35,000 production deployments world-wide. RabbitMQ is lightweight and easy to deploy on premises and in the cloud and runs on all major operating systems. It supports most developer platforms, multiple messaging protocols and can be deployed in distributed and federated configurations to meet high-scale, high-availability requirements.
Offer
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Learn more about VMware RabbitMQ
Sample Customers
Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
International Affairs Institute11%
Retailer8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
REVIEWERS
University17%
Computer Software Company8%
Security Firm8%
Transportation Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider18%
Media Company6%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business41%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise44%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, VMware and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2020.
442,764 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 9th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 3rd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 4 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.0, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Excellent stability, capable of scaling, and good at supporting security particulars". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "Has the ability to utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, ActiveMQ, IBM MQ, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and Apache Kafka, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, IBM MQ, Apache Kafka, PubSub+ Event Broker and Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.