Compare Automic Workload Automation vs. Operations Orchestration

Automic Workload Automation is ranked 2nd in Workload Automation with 57 reviews while Operations Orchestration is ranked 11th in Process Automation with 1 review. Automic Workload Automation is rated 8.2, while Operations Orchestration is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Automic Workload Automation writes "Handling SAP processes is very easy, while distributed architecture keeps jobs running". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Operations Orchestration writes "It has alacrity, but lacks ability to scale". Automic Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, CA Workload Automation and Ansible, whereas Operations Orchestration is most compared with Ansible, Puppet Enterprise and BMC TrueSight Orchestration.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, CA (A Broadcom Company), Stonebranch and others in Workload Automation. Updated: December 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature of this solution is the scheduler.I have found new methods for converting scripts from Dollar U to ONE Automation. For example, I take the dynamic library from Dollar U and put it in the dynamic binary library in ONE Automation. This enables us to use Dollar U scripts in ONE Automation.The most valuable feature is the one for SAP batch processing... There are certain other mid-level workload automation tools which can handle the OS level, but SAP is something which is really very critical. Automic stands out from the ordinary tools because handling SAP processes is absolutely easy with it.It saves a lot of time and mistakes, because we used to do a lot of manual work. Since we added automation a little bit over a year now, it has enhanced our daily work.We automate very manual, robust tasks, which are very time consuming and not error-free.We impose some standards for backup and restore operations.An important feature is the ability to modify PeopleSoft Run Controls at run-time.It's pretty stable. After implementation, there hasn't been a single event where we shifted our jobs for the day from automated to manual.

Read more »

It has reduced the time taken to go to market. In the past, we were struggling with building these integrations, but now the process has sped up and there is an added advantage of quick delivery. In addition, it is an agent-less solution, which provides more flexibility in terms of multiple options.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to see more types of Calendars in the next release of this solution.There were many bugs in the last version. For example, we could only use capital letters for searching for agent names. Also, we had a problem with ONE Automation where we couldn't use the PGA and SGA in Oracle Databases for resolving RAM because the last version didn't have this capability.There are certain jobs that are triggered one after another. It would be helpful to have a more user-friendly way of seeing how these jobs are connecting from one server to another.Depending on the properties of the jobs and pre- and post-conditions, there needs to be more flexible and richer conditions that I can check for. This would be a great addition.There could be a better user interface for end users. They should make it more intuitive, not based on Java.With every new version, things that would previously work, Automic breaks them. So, we have to report the new bugs. Therefore, every time when we patch the system, there is usually a new bug or a feature that was working, then it stops working.There are some scripting elements that could be added.Some of the things we don't do are mainly because we don't know how to do them. Hands-on training can be expensive, so we find other ways to work around things to forgo the hands-on training. It is also an issue because we are a Linux shop and most trainers are Windows-based.

Read more »

There were a lot of scalability issues that we initially faced. Whenever I tried to deploy 100-200 endpoints, it became a huge challenge. We had to actually start using other tools like Tivoli Endpoint Management in order to patch the issues.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I only know that AWA is cheaper than Control-M, but I'm not aware of the numbers.Certain licenses can be a bit expensive. The PeopleSoft agents, in particular, are a bit pricey.This is a support system for us, not our core business, so we purchased this product inexpensively.We came to a very good deal, but it took us three years to finalize.We have increased efficiency with this application.We receive time efficiency from this product.Every time there is a task which must be repeated, the solution can reduce costs.There are a lot of new features, but we do not use them because they are too expensive. The price point could be less.

Read more »

I do not have experience with the pricing or licensing of the product.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
out of 22 in Workload Automation
Views
11,402
Comparisons
4,179
Reviews
57
Average Words per Review
560
Avg. Rating
8.2
11th
out of 32 in Process Automation
Views
4,732
Comparisons
3,491
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
381
Avg. Rating
6.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 39% of the time.
Also Known As
Automic Dollar UniverseMicro Focus Operations Orchestration, HPOO, HPE Operations Orchestration
Learn
CA (A Broadcom Company)
Micro Focus
Overview

Deliver the fully agile enterprise using CA Automic Workload Automation 

The modern enterprise needs to orchestrate a complex, diverse landscape of applications, platforms and technologies. Workload automation can prove a critical differentiator, but only if it provides intelligent automation driven by data analytics.

The IT landscape is currently more complex than ever: Islands of automation are a barrier to scaling and standardizing your workload activities. Processing errors are common because of manual handoffs. And the lack of an end-to-end view of the business process make inefficiencies and problems difficult to resolve. In addition to this, you are operating 24x7 and cannot find maintenance windows to upgrade your infrastructure in order to innovate. 

CA Automic Workload Automation gives you the agility, speed, visibility and scalability needed to respond to the constantly changing technology landscape. It centrally manages and automates the execution of business processes end-to-end; across mainframe, cloud and hybrid environments in a way that never stops—even when doing an upgrade to the next version.

Micro Focus Operations Orchestration is the next-generation IT Process Automation solution for those businesses who want to automate their processes, operations, and IT tasks from the data center to the cloud. This solution allows IT to focus on innovation instead of on mundane tasks, and has many business benefits, which are discussed in detail below.

Micro Focus Operations Orchestration supports multiple IT domains, such as Cloud, Virtualization, SAP Orchestration, Security Ops, and Dev/Ops.

Offer
Learn more about Automic Workload Automation
Learn more about Operations Orchestration
Sample Customers
ING, Adidas, 84.51, ESB Casablanca INT, Internet Initiative Japan, Railway Information Systems, Samsung SDS, and Turkcell.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm35%
Manufacturing Company14%
Insurance Company9%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company24%
Financial Services Firm21%
Government10%
Marketing Services Firm7%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider25%
Financial Services Firm17%
Hospitality Company8%
Healthcare Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise84%
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Large Enterprise82%
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, CA (A Broadcom Company), Stonebranch and others in Workload Automation. Updated: December 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email