We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and BMC TrueSight Server Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."It streamlines processing really well, so we're able to cut down on our processing times."
"Integration with multiple services and applications across the enterprise."
"It allows you to automate tasks, and reduce headcount, prevent errors, self-heal."
"Automic Automation Engine provides us the ability to map logic using a scripting language."
"This solution enables us to improve our daily processing times. We can do everything faster than before we used this solution."
"The most valuable feature of AutoSys Workload Automation is user-friendliness. If someone has some knowledge of the tool they can use it."
"It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good."
"The web UI is beneficial and the granular security policies allow us to cover all of our audit requirements."
"The ability to script and create BL packages to perform various functions. This makes automating our environment relatively easy to do."
"The most important feature is the schedulings."
"BMC Bladelogic Automation can be used across many OS platforms, providing us flexibility for deployments."
"Scalability is good."
"It gives us more speed to deliver services and applications, and we rely on security."
"Among the most valuable features is its flexibility and ability to work across multiple operating systems. Being able to execute some form of data collection and not have to worry about whether I'm working on a Linux box, or a Windows box, or the underlying OS, I can do these collections, get these results, and put them together in a uniform format which makes it easier to present back to management."
"Technical support is good."
"BladeLogic lets users view the filesystem with minimal authorization to the server."
"They could do better supporting it. They have too many of the same type of products, so sometimes it doesn't get as much attention as it should."
"Reduce the number of operational files. This would make the job of a system programmer supporting ESP easier."
"The graphical interface can be improved."
"Ease of implementation for upgrades."
"The solution could improve by having support for container environments."
"We have to escalate through channels to get to somebody who knows what's going on. It takes time that we do not necessarily have."
"Some of the reports are either a bit hard to understand or don’t give you what you might expect to see."
"I am looking forward to more of their dashboard features. I think it would be very valuable for us to have dashboard features that could be delivered to our customers in the form of a URL, and they could refresh that URL whenever they wanted to get up to date performance metrics out of our systems."
"Provisioning needs to be more user-friendly. We were using BladeLogic for provisioning, but due to a lot of issues and complications, we had to stop using provisioning with this tool."
"I would like to see more container integration in the next release of this solution."
"The number of APIs available within the tool needs improvement. At the moment, we have a couple of different scanning tools used within the organization, but only one of those is integrated back into Server Automation. There is another tool that they use in another part of the business where it doesn't have an out-of-the-box adaptor for it. We would have to go and create or develop something bespoke to be able to integrate it with that scanning tool. Whereas, with the other scanning tool, there was an API available. To make it easier, I would like to have more APIs available for different scanning tools within that line of business."
"Resource management on the base servers is sluggish and could be improved."
"There is no other functionality available to patch the containers that we need to include."
"Scaling the environment during setup at larger organizations with 10,000 employees gets complicated."
"We would like to see this solution handle more multitasking."
"We encountered some reporting issues. Also, we needed to gather information from the backend before the product execution. The output's format is not good."
More BMC TrueSight Server Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while BMC TrueSight Server Automation is ranked 12th in Configuration Management with 18 reviews. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while BMC TrueSight Server Automation is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Server Automation writes "Easy to deploy, automatic patching, and scalable". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation, whereas BMC TrueSight Server Automation is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, BigFix, Red Hat Satellite, Microsoft Configuration Manager and HashiCorp Terraform.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
