Azure Firewall Manager vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
1,098 views|823 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks Logo
6,624 views|3,277 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Firewall Manager and Palo Alto Networks Panorama based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Azure Firewall Manager is the testing and configuration.""The tool's support is good.""The solution is very easy to set up.""It is easy to install and does not require any plugins for your browser.""The solution has improved our organization with its firewall."

More Azure Firewall Manager Pros →

"I found logging and management features the most valuable in Palo Alto Networks Panorama. Another good feature of the product is that it lets you define global firewall policies and templates.""Especially for big, worldwide clients, one of the most valuable features is being able to create some rules to place on the security groups.""It has shared profiles for all gateways. If I do not have Panorama, I need to create a separate profile for each and every gateway by logging into that particular gateway, but with Panorama, I can create a shared profile and just push it down to each and every gateway connected to it.""The ability to manage a large number of firewalls from a single point is most valuable.""Technical support is helpful and knowledgeable.""Centralized firewall management and update management are the most valuable features.""The solution offers good logging features.""The solution doesn't need a proxy for the Prisma Access Firewall."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Pros →

Cons
"The price is okay. This said, the solution is certainly expensive in comparison with other cloud services.""There should be a simple one-click deployment for a firewall, rather than a set of setup instructions that include steps such as the DNS configuration, et cetera.""We could do only one-way NAT-ing, where the traffic comes from outside to internal, to Azure, which is fine. However, when we actually do NAT-ed traffic to hit the firewall, that way is not working.""The solution can improve the integration with open-source tools.""The tool's security features need to improve. It needs also to include a monitoring system for logs. It is also complicated to find a query on the Azure firewall."

More Azure Firewall Manager Cons →

"The ability to add scheduled jobs would be a significant improvement. Panorama has the ability to push out OS updates, but it would be nice to be able to schedule those updates so not to affect the site during normal business hours.""Reporting might be an area to improve. It can provide reporting or some sort of graphical representation of your environment.""The general customer feedback is when saving the configuration, it takes a long time. That needs to be fixed. The troubleshooting, the debugging part is also a little bit of a pain. It's not user-friendly on the interface to do our debugging when comparing it with other firewalls, like Forcepoint.""At times we have noticed that we get into issues where Panorama is going too slow or has other little problems. The performance can suffer occasionally.""Palo Alto Networks Panorama has some bugs that could be fixed.""Aside from pricing, I don't have any issues with Panorama.""Palo Alto Networks Panorama could improve by making the solution less expensive.""The initial setup requires expertise and can be a bit complex."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is certainly expensive in comparison with other cloud services."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable but it is reasonable for the features."
  • More Azure Firewall Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is high compared to other vendors in the same space. Licensing is also fairly high for different functions to be added on."
  • "With the URL filtering, we probably went down from around four hours in response time to about five minutes."
  • "The licensing is not cheap. There are always hidden costs. You have support costs, or maybe you need to buy more optics on how the solution fits into the rest of your environment. It is possible some of the rest of your environment will need to change too."
  • "It has freed up staff time, which is where we are seeing ROI."
  • "Initially, Palo Alto looks expensive, but if you dig deeper then you will find that it is very comparable, or even cheaper than other solutions."
  • "You only pay for the license and there are no additional costs."
  • "We pay approximately $3,000 a year in order to use the product."
  • "The pricing model is reasonable for this class of solutions."
  • More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Azure Firewall Manager is the testing and configuration.
    Top Answer:The price of the solution is reasonable but it is reasonable for the features.
    Top Answer:The solution can improve the integration with open-source tools.
    Top Answer:The most valuable aspect of Palo Alto Networks Panorama for me is the centralized management of multiple firewalls.
    Top Answer:In terms of pricing, Palo Alto Networks Panorama is moderate. It is very affordable when compared to more expensive firewalls. The license is yearly, and the price typically includes the initial… more »
    Top Answer:In the future, it would be beneficial if Panorama could include a firewall assurance feature similar to Skybox. While each firewall has its policy optimizer, a consolidated policy optimizer in… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,098
    Comparisons
    823
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    231
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    6,624
    Comparisons
    3,277
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    412
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Azure Firewall Manager is a security management service that provides central security policy and route management for cloud-based security perimeters.

    To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

    Panorama network security management provides static rules and dynamic security updates in an ever-changing threat landscape. Reduce administrator workload and improve your overall security posture with a single rule base for firewall, threat prevention, URL filtering, application awareness, user identification, file blocking and data filtering.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Media Company7%
    Pharma/Biotech Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Firewall Manager is ranked 13th in Firewall Security Management with 5 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 3rd in Firewall Security Management with 80 reviews. Azure Firewall Manager is rated 7.8, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Firewall Manager writes "Useful testing, simple configuration, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Built-in proxy with the ability to maintain your own policies". Azure Firewall Manager is most compared with Azure Firewall, AWS Firewall Manager, FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF), AlgoSec and Tufin Orchestration Suite, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AWS Firewall Manager, AlgoSec, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Tufin Orchestration Suite and Fortinet FortiPortal. See our Azure Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama report.

    See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

    We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.