Compare Azure Monitor vs. New Relic Browser

Azure Monitor is ranked 10th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 7 reviews while New Relic Browser is ranked 30th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 2 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 8.0, while New Relic Browser is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "This integrated add-on for Microsoft Azure helps monitor performance of the base product ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic Browser writes "Stable and scalable but does not provide input regarding page performance". Azure Monitor is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog and Splunk, whereas New Relic Browser is most compared with New Relic APM, Akamai mPulse and Datadog.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Azure Monitor Logo
1,489 views|1,226 comparisons
New Relic Browser Logo
1,012 views|707 comparisons
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Datadog and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: March 2020.
405,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use.The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up.The most valuable feature is that it's stable. It hasn't crossed any thresholds.A product that is well-integrated for monitoring Microsoft Azure.The solution integrates well with the Microsoft platform.It's a service from Microsoft, so it will scale.I am impressed by the reporting on the average eight ports that we get from this solution.

Read more »

The most valuable features are infrastructure monitoring and application performance monitoring (APM).The solution is quite stable.

Read more »

Cons
I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now.When something goes down, we want the option to have automation in place to get it back up again as quickly as possible.The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring.As a younger product it still has room for feature improvement and enhancement.n comparison to New Relic, which I've used before, it's a bit more complicated. It's not as easy to use. It also took some time to get it working. The implementation needs to be simpler.They can simplify the overall complexity since you have multiple data sources in the cloud for monitoring. It's quite simple, but there are so many portals. It takes time to work with it. If they could simplify the user configuration, that would be good.They need to work on a more hybrid deployment that will allow us to monitor local on-premise deployments and connect to different systems. I would like to see more integration.

Read more »

It would help customers if there were an on-premises version available.The solution does not provide input on how the page performs in a big group. It just says that the page performance is bad, but it does not say what can be done to improve it. If they could provide some insight or guidance on how to make improvements, that would be a big help.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
This is an expensive product.The solution is quite expensive. It costs around $5,000 a month. There aren't any additional costs above that.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
405,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,489
Comparisons
1,226
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
434
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
1,012
Comparisons
707
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
341
Avg. Rating
6.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 46% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Learn
Microsoft
New Relic
Overview

Azure Monitor maximizes the availability and performance of your applications by delivering a comprehensive solution for collecting, analyzing, and acting on telemetry from your cloud and on-premises environments. It helps you understand how your applications are performing and proactively identifies issues affecting them and the resources they depend on.

New Relic Browser provides deep visibility and actionable insights into real users' experiences on your website. With standard page load timing (sometimes referred to as real user monitoring or RUM), New Relic measures the overall time to load the entire webpage. However, New Relic Browser goes beyond RUM to also help you monitor the performance of individual sessions, AJAX requests, and JavaScript errors extending the monitoring throughout the entire life cycle of the page.
Offer
Learn more about Azure Monitor
Learn more about New Relic Browser
Sample Customers
Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group Fairfax Media, Despergar.com, MercadoLibre, Veracode, Costa Coffee, Kiva, Alkami, Mondia Media, Bringmeister.de, Simplesurance, Confused.com, ReachLocal, Lending Club, Boozt.com, Trainline
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company48%
Comms Service Provider9%
Manufacturing Company8%
Insurance Company7%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Datadog and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: March 2020.
405,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.