We compared Barracuda Intronis Backup and MSP360 Backup across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Barracuda Intronis Backup is praised for its strong backup capabilities, user-friendly cloud management portal, and staff training opportunities. MSP360 Backup offers a convenient way to track successful backups and detect any missing ones, eliminating the need for manual verification.
Room for Improvement: The Barracuda Intronis Backup could improve its integration, speed, and orchestration capabilities. The users say MSP360 Backup could benefit from improved integration, an expanded knowledge base, and faster restore time.
Service and Support: Customers have consistently praised Barracuda Intronis Backup for their excellent and knowledgeable technical support. However, some reviewers reported challenges with escalation and communication within the support team. Users say MSP360 Backup has good technical support, but some reported that the level of detail required for the backup process is challenging.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Barracuda Intronis Backup is simple and involves configuring IP settings and connecting to Cloud Control. Some reviewers have said that the setup process for MSP360 Backup is easy, while others found it complex.
Pricing: Barracuda Intronis Backup provides a comprehensive and reasonably priced setup package. MSP360 Backup is considered reasonably priced and cheaper than competing solutions, but there are additional costs for storage space.
ROI: Barracuda Intronis Backup provides added financial benefits and time efficiency. Users provided no feedback on the ROI of MSP360 Backup.
Comparison Results: Barracuda Intronis Backup stands out for its extensive training resources and direct cloud mapping, but users would like to see better performance and integration. MSP360 Backup has a user-friendly interface, supports consumer cloud drives, and offers good technical support, but some users have faulted the solution for its lack of integration and long restore times.
"It is very stable, and I'm very happy with this solution."
"The configuration and the onboarding process are pretty good."
"Most important is its ease of use. You plug it in, follow the steps, and you have your backup file."
"The most important feature in Barracuda Backup is the ability to archive the backup of emails."
"The scalability of the product is fine."
"Barracuda's support is probably one of the best things about them, even with all their solutions. With any problem that we have, or even questions, we get the assistance that we need. The turnaround is pretty quick."
"It's a one-stop shop, meaning we just program and schedule the backups, decide what is being backed up, and then it automatically replicates and deduplicates."
"The performance is good and the interface is user-friendly."
"Technical support is very good."
"MSP360 Backup's most valuable feature is its backup interface."
"One massive advantage of this solution, as compared to more enterprise products, is that no firewall changes are needed on the client's premises. For the product to back up from the client's premise to the cloud, it just needs port 8 and port 443, which are anyway always open. This was one of the things that made us decide to go with the product. It is very difficult to justify a firewall change for a small client who doesn't even know what a firewall is and how to maintain a firewall, or doesn't have anybody maintaining their firewall. You then have to maintain the firewall. MSP360 Backup takes away firewall change requirements, VPNs, or channels that are needed for the backup."
"The initial setup is very easy. It's not overly complex."
"Provides connectivity to a lot of different cloud storage solutions."
"The best feature is that it's very user-friendly to do scheduled backups and version maintenance."
"Block level transfers have significantly reduced the amount of time for transfers over some other solutions"
"I was mainly concerned with cloud backups, OneDrive backups, consumer OneDrive, business OneDrive, Google backups, and SharePoint backups. The solution did a good job of the backup."
"The restore time can be improved. The restore time for large quantities of folders is slow. Sometimes, if I'm doing a full recovery of a server, it takes multiple hours, which probably is natural. It might also be because of our internet speed to the cloud."
"This solution could be improved with offering lower prices at scale."
"I would like to see the Live Boot feature extended to Hyper-V machines, in addition to VMware machines."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see cloud support and deduplication functionality."
"It would be nice to have some reports generated on the usage, but it is not essential."
"I am working in some of the more rural areas of Sweden, and some of the customers here are a little bit wary of cloud technology at the moment. It is not like in Gothenburg or Stockholm, where people rely on it so much more. In the rural areas, companies are saying that we do need to use the cloud, and they are being very wary about their data, especially with GDPR and all that kind of stuff. Having more control and having an option for backing up locally, even if you don't want to use it, would be something very good. The cloud backup is brilliant, but there should be an option to take that cloud backup and save it locally as well. If you lose connection to the internet or you lose access to your data in the cloud, having a backup copy of the latest data on your server is helpful. You need to be able to get access to your customers' files, especially with GDPR, where you need to know where your customers' details are. If they're in the cloud and you've lost access to them, then you'll go into those GDPR regulations. This is somewhere where both Barracuda and Veeam haven't gone as far. As far as I have understood, with Veeam, you can back up your local servers to the cloud but not vice versa. I haven't worked on it much."
"It is not always stable."
"Its speed can be a bit improved, and of course, its pricing can go a lot cheaper."
"The solution needs a better graphical user interface. It's a graphical user interface that is very old-school right now. They could give it a little more modern feel."
"The graphics are looking a bit old and should be updated."
"Maybe implement an easier interface for basic users. For example, a set-up wizard with all the commonly used features as default."
"The product could be more user-friendly."
"The interface feels like it is targeted for end users who typically are looking for an all-in-one integrated push button solution. It would be better if the interface had a beginner mode and an expert mode."
"Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service."
"There are some things that we don't like about it. That is why I was exploring alternatives in a hyper-scale environment. That is why I was checking IT Central Station."
"They can add some production backup capabilities and the ability to do single instance back up. At the moment, it doesn't do deduplication on the standard backup. So, the issue is backing up PSG files for customers who have limited bandwidth. The other issue is that I don't like the implementation of the SQL backup. We do use SQL ourselves using a PowerShell script with the VDA tools as a module. That's how we back up. The rotation feature would be nice to have, but I know that they've got it on their dashboard or on their list to look at. They can also do a few tweaks to the dashboard. I would like the reporting capabilities on the portal to be much more granular. Normally, I export it to a text file, and then I run it through a pivot table in order to look at it from a cost-recovery point of view and to see when the backup last ran and if it was successful when it ran two or three days ago. Such a feature would work really well for my market. They can also add a cost-effective backup for Android and Apple cellphones. I've had one or two customers who were looking for this feature. I haven't found this functionality at the moment. I've been looking for a product that does that."
Barracuda Intronis Backup is ranked 5th in MSP Backup with 24 reviews while MSP360 Backup is ranked 2nd in MSP Backup with 15 reviews. Barracuda Intronis Backup is rated 8.4, while MSP360 Backup is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Barracuda Intronis Backup writes "Finding data to restore is much easier than rummaging through tapes to find backups". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MSP360 Backup writes "The solution provides the ability to backup all types of cloud drives, is inexpensive, and has decent support". Barracuda Intronis Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Acronis Cyber Protect, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) and Azure Backup, whereas MSP360 Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, N-able Cove Data Protection, Acronis Cyber Protect, NinjaOne and Comet Backup. See our Barracuda Intronis Backup vs. MSP360 Backup report.
See our list of best MSP Backup vendors.
We monitor all MSP Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
