We performed a comparison between Bitrix24 and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Bitrix24's workflow is better than that of others. The user interface is also good."
"I am impressed with the solution's ability to customize workflows."
"Offers, a free version."
"Bitrix24 is a user-friendly solution that is easy to use."
"I believe that having one system that handles all of the functions that we need in a business, such as marketing, sales, pipeline management, project management, meetings, customer contact, customer feedback, social media integrations, and connections to our cloud data storage, Google, and Microsoft, is a good idea."
"Collaboration and CRM are the most valuable features of Bitrix24."
"It is easy to use and very stable."
"The technical support was intuitive and had good documentation."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."
"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."
"The solution's tech support is good."
"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."
"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."
"The support provided by Bitrix24 is an area with shortcomings that needs improvement."
"It's a team management tool, but the way the tasks are assigned and the way you are able to control them are lacking when compared to Asana or monday.com. The latter tools are a lot more adaptable to team management. Thus, better features to control the team are needed in Bitrix24."
"There are some bugs in the mobile system."
"In my opinion, everything needs improvement. It all starts with the user experience. It's extremely difficult to use, it's always lagging, It doesn't look particularly appealing, in terms of how it looks, and it is extremely difficult to locate the stages."
"We didn't have the ability to customize the solution."
"This solution was built using old technology which is now mixed with new technologies. This can make it challenging to get new features live."
"I would like to see improvements with Bitrix24's marketing automation."
"Compared to Microsoft, we found Bitrix24 a little complex because it's new to us, and we don't understand it much."
"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."
"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."
"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."
More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitrix24 is ranked 12th in Project Management Software with 18 reviews while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is ranked 11th in Project Portfolio Management with 6 reviews. Bitrix24 is rated 7.4, while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Bitrix24 writes "A project management tool that offers great scalability and stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management writes "It helps us track progress and results". Bitrix24 is most compared with Zoho CRM, Asana, Odoo, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and ClickUp, whereas Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, JIRA Portfolio, EcoSys, Broadcom Clarity and LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal. See our Bitrix24 vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
