We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick."
"They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us."
"The stability is good."
"It supports any number of features and has a lot of tutorials."
"The solution offers flexibility with its configurations."
"It can support both web applications and mobile applications, and in certain cases, it can also support testing of desktop applications or software-based applications. You can write web applications, mobile applications, and software-based applications."
"In terms of improvement, I would like to have the ability to customize reports."
"Having more options for customization would be helpful."
"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."
"The reporting capabilities could be improved."
"Lacks an option to include additional users during a test run."
"There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies."
"The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan."
"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."
BlazeMeter is ranked 7th in Performance Testing Tools with 5 reviews while IBM Rational Performance Tester is ranked 18th in Test Management Tools with 1 review. BlazeMeter is rated 7.6, while IBM Rational Performance Tester is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "Easy to navigate and offers reasonable pricing but needs grouping features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational Performance Tester writes "Supports web and mobile applications, very scalable, very stable, and wonderful support". BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad and Selenium HQ, whereas IBM Rational Performance Tester is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad, IBM Rational Test Workbench and Selenium HQ.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.