BlazeMeter Logo

BlazeMeter pros and cons

Vendor: Perforce
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader
1,854 followers
Post review
 

BlazeMeter Pros review quotes

Bala Maddu - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 17, 2022
The on-the-fly test data improved our testing productivity a lot. The new test data features changed how we test the applications because there are different things we can do. We can use mock data or real data. We can also build data based on different formats.
Lalit Parkale - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 18, 2022
It's a great platform because it's a SaaS solution, but it also builds the on-premises hosting solutions, so we have implemented a hybrid approach. BlazeMeter sets us up for our traditional hosting platforms and application stack as well as the modern cloud-based or SaaS-based application technologies.
VA
Jan 25, 2024
With the help of the Mock Services, we are overcoming everything. Wherever we are facing issues, whether they will be long term or temporary, by implementing the Mock Services we can bypass the faulty components that are not needed for our particular testing.
Learn what your peers think about BlazeMeter. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ryan Mohan - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 3, 2022
The orchestration feature is the most valuable. It's like the tourist backend component of BlazeMeter. It allows me to essentially give BlazeMeter multiple JMeter scripts and a YAML file, and it will orchestrate and execute that load test and all those scripts as I define them.
MR
Jul 15, 2022
Using cloud-based load generators is highly valuable to us, as we can test from outside our network and increase load generation without having to upscale our hardware as much. The cloud load generator is there when we need it and is the feature we leverage the most.
SY
May 22, 2022
The feature that stands out the most is their action groups. They act like functions or methods and code, allowing us to reuse portions of our tests. That also means we have a single point for maintenance when updates are required. Instead of updating a hundred different test cases, we update one action group, and the test cases using that action group will update.
Robinson Caiado Guimarães - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 28, 2022
One thing that we are doing a lot with the solution, and it's very good, is orchestrating a lot of JMeter agents. This feature has helped us a lot because we can reuse other vendors' performance scripts that they have used with JMeter before.
Vikram Vallabhineni - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 10, 2024
The product's initial setup phase was simple.
SG
Feb 21, 2024
In our company, various teams use BlazeMeter, particularly appreciating its cloud license software, which supports up to 5,000 users. BlazeMeter's cloud capabilities allow us to load test or simulate traffic from any location worldwide, such as Europe, North America, South America, Australia, and even specific cities like Delhi. So, with one cloud license, we can simulate user load from various locations globally.
MD
Aug 8, 2022
For me, the best part is that we can graphically see the test result at runtime. It helps us understand the behavior of the application during all stages of the test.
 

BlazeMeter Cons review quotes

Bala Maddu - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 17, 2022
Version controlling of the test cases and the information, the ability to compare the current version and the previous version within Runscope would be really nice. The history shows who made the changes, but it doesn't compare the changes.
Lalit Parkale - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 18, 2022
The seamless integration with mobiles could be improved.
VA
Jan 25, 2024
One problem, while we are executing a test, is that it will take some time to download data. Let's say I'm performance testing with a high-end load configuration. It takes a minimum of three minutes or so to start the test itself. That's the bad part of the performance testing... every time I rerun the same test, it is downloaded again... That means I have to wait for three to four minutes again.
Learn what your peers think about BlazeMeter. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ryan Mohan - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 3, 2022
BlazeMeter needs more granular access control. Currently, BlazeMeter controls everything at a workspace level, so a user can view or modify anything inside that workspace depending on their role. It would be nice if there was a more granular control where you could say, "This person can only do A, B, and C," or, "This user only has access to functional testing. This user only has access to mock services." That feature set doesn't currently exist.
MR
Jul 15, 2022
We encountered some minor bugs, and I would like to have the ability to add load generators to workspaces without having to use APIs. We can't do that now, so we're beholden to the APIs.
SY
May 22, 2022
The performance could be better. When reviewing finished cases, it sometimes takes a while for BlazeMeter to load. That has improved recently, but it's still a problem with unusually large test cases. The same goes for editing test cases. When editing test cases, it starts to take a long time to open those action groups and stuff.
Robinson Caiado Guimarães - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 28, 2022
I believe that data management and test server virtualization are things that Perforce is working on, or should be working on.
Vikram Vallabhineni - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 10, 2024
From a performance perspective, BlazeMeter needs to be improved...BlazeMeter has not found the extensions for WebSockets or Java Applet.
SG
Feb 21, 2024
Integration is one of the things lacking in BlazeMeter compared to some newer options.
MD
Aug 8, 2022
The Timeline Report panel has no customization options. One feature that I missed was not having a time filter, which I had in ELK. For example, there are only filter requests for a time of less than 5 seconds.