Compare Bonita vs. WorkflowGen
Sponsored
 | Anonymous User Digital Engineering Manager at a comms service provider |
 | Thosleaf Thos Center of Excellence Technical Lead at UST Global España |
 | Christopher Odonoghue SAP Solution Lead at Johnson & Johnson |
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Signavio, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design. Updated: March 2021.
475,705 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."
"Compared to other products on the market, Bonita presents a pretty acceptable level of robustness."
"I really enjoy using the workflow management."
"This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."
"The solution is stable. Even the older versions are stable."
"The user interface is better than all of the open-source BPMs that I have tried."
"Flexible and drag-and-drop type of UI is very valuable. The integrations are also very good. You can build workflows very quickly, which is my favorite activity. By using the GUI, you can build the entire mechanism, notifications, and all this kind of stuff."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
Cons
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."
"We are struggling a bit with integrations."
"It is missing some important features that other products have."
"The community edition has limited module functionality. If they could release some of the functionality that's available in the enterprise edition that would be helpful to those learning to use the solution."
"I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation."
"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"Camunda is much cheaper."
"I use the open-source free version."
"The open-source version of the product is free to use."
"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."
"The Community Edition comes free of charge."
"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."
"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."
Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.
475,705 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it.
Top Answer: There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly… more »
Top Answer: In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process… more »
Top Answer: The user interface is better than all of the open-source BPMs that I have tried.
Top Answer: We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge.
Top Answer: I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation. They should include more examples, as well… more »
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 48% of the time.
Camunda BPM
Bonita BPM
Reinventing Process Automation for the Digital Enterprise
Our process automation platform enables tens of thousands of developers to design, automate and improve processes and provide better customer experiences, deliver projects faster and increase business agility.
A complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations and analytics
Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.
Immediately accelerate business process adaptability with fluid workflow automation. Use the WorkflowGen .NET workflow software's low code environment to maximize the efficiency of process designers and developers.
Automate any type of human and system-based enterprise process within a battle-tested infrastructure.
Customize and integrate your workflow apps to meet your requirements in a highly configurable environment.
Engage process participants with a full-featured workflow portal, native mobile apps, and email approvals, or through seamless integration with your own web apps.
Leverage a solution used by Fortune 500 companies for worldwide business-critical applications.
Learn more about Camunda Platform
Learn more about Bonita
Learn more about WorkflowGen
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, Accruent
With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.
Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group.
WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.
Financial Services Firm27%
Comms Service Provider20%
Non Profit13%
Government13%
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm12%
Government6%
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider25%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government7%
No Data Available
Small Business48%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise29%
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise60%
Small Business40%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise45%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Signavio, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design. Updated: March 2021.
475,705 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Bonita is ranked 10th in Business Process Design with 6 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 22nd in Business Process Design with 1 review. Bonita is rated 7.6, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Bonita writes "Helps us to create the process, pages, and forms and is easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". Bonita is most compared with Bizagi, Pega BPM, Apache Airflow, ProcessMaker and AuraQuantic, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with KiSSFLOW.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors, best Business Process Management vendors, and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.