We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"Their new licensing is very flexible. With Informatica Cloud, you have plenty of items under the same umbrella, such as services, offerings, data quality, and data masking. You have also got master data management and API management. What I really like about them is that you don't need to go to Informatica and say that you need a data integration module. You would say that you need iPaaS or Informatica Cloud. They'll then try to understand your needs and give you IPUs, which are the processing units. If I purchased a hundred IPUs from Informatica as a customer, I can use 70 IPUs for data integration. I would also need data quality, so I can use 10 IPUs for data quality. I can use the remaining 20 IPUs for API management. Down the line, if I see that my initial data integration needs for the development phase are met, then out of the 70 IPUs assigned for data integration, I can use 30 IPUs for data masking. I can shuffle these numbers in any way within the Informatica Cloud umbrella for the tenure for which I have subscribed to these IPUs. I can use all services the way I want. This flexibility is what I really love about Informatica. It also has got good connectors."
"I do a quite a lot of data transformations, and the fact that I can do them without changing any of my SQL queries from the code, using the inbuilt tools, is very helpful."
"The user interface which is very easy to use if we have any problems to solve."
"Whether we need data cleansing or data mastering, we get it all in one platform."
"The solution's initial setup is quite straightforward."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"A general improvement in icons and the virtual interface would be good."
"The regions in which the data resides are still limited. This could be an issue in terms of the data residency laws of some of the countries. They should get more regions."
"I would like to see support for more data sources."
"Connectivity could be improved, it can be a little slow."
"There may be some types of limitations with the performance."
"When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"
"The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."
"The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."
"My understanding is that Informatica is quite expensive compare to other tools that are available in the market."
The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 6th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 7 reviews while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 2nd in Cloud Data Integration with 5 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 8.0, while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Fairly easy for a semi-technical user to configure and maintain it and is very visual". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "Flexible licensing, good connectors, and timely upgrades and patches". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server and Talend Open Studio, whereas Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform and SnapLogic. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Informatica Cloud Data Integration report.
See our list of best Data Integration Tools vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.