We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Zapier based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"The most valuable feature of Zapier is it saves me time doing repetitive tasks."
"Zapier is a really good tool for connecting multiple different platforms and data sources. For example, with Quickbase, I can easily integrate data from other sources like AWS or task-tracking platforms such as ClickUp or Asana."
"The solution is a SaaS and does not require a complex setup."
"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."
"The product's most valuable feature is automation."
"Zapier's interface, for me, is the solution's greatest value proposition. It is designed and developed for people who don't have a clue about what they're trying to do. It has a very user-friendly interface."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is very intuitive and has a very flat learning curve."
"Webhooks are the most valuable feature of Zapier."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"The user interface for Zapier could be improved. It also takes some time to sync the data between different environments."
"Some recent changes to the solution have made it bulky and not as intuitive to use as it previously was."
"Zapier needs to improve in the same way most RPA solutions should, such as Robocorp, Make, or UiPath. They are not good at helping you find the connections that you need for the problem that you have. For example, if need something on Instagram. I'm going to have to do research for hours to be able to find the components or the app, which is going to do what I need it to do. It makes it difficult to use the system when you don't know what to use."
"I think that this solution should have more apps connected to it."
"System-to-system is fine, but when it comes to system-to-user, where Zapier is helping to communicate to a user, that's a one-way communication. If that user has to perform some action on that notification, the action isn't handled by Zapier. So there's no way to orchestrate that and it's very cumbersome."
"I would like to see them improve the Quickbase integration. Currently, it only allows triggering actions when records are added, but it would be more useful if we could also trigger actions when records are modified or deleted."
"The pricing of the solution is quite expensive."
"After mapping them out, and they'd worked for a while, I've had Zapier fail."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Zapier is ranked 10th in Cloud Data Integration with 41 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Zapier is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zapier writes "A tool for automation purposes requiring an easy initial setup while offering a very helpful technical support team ". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and AWS Glue, whereas Zapier is most compared with AWS Glue, Alteryx Designer, Tray.io, Coefficient and MuleSoft Composer. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Zapier report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
