We performed a comparison between Brinqa and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities."
"With RSA Archer, an admin can set permissions for a normal user to go directly to the tool they need to input some data. Admins can then go through that and approve some requests. Also, they can log in based on these kinds of permissions, including ticketing, service patches, or upgrades."
"The most valuable part of the product is the ease-of-use and the opportunity to create custom security applications easily."
"Easy to implement with a high level of automation."
"Even non-technical people can be masters of the product."
"The most valuable features of RSA Archer are the asset management, risk management, and vendor management."
"RSA is a very rich application. I like its adaptive suggestion, where based on your users and the class of data, it can actually recommend you the proper control to choose. For example, we have been using PCI DSS as an NIST. So based on application feedback, it will provide you with a suggestion on which control objective needs to be set. Based on that, you can make a decision—you don't need to take the suggestion, but you can customize that particular provided suggestion. RSA Archer's workflow is also good, in terms of process automation."
"The solution has helped our organization manage our internal and external activities."
"The product is very flexible."
"Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision."
"Some of the error reporting isn't very clear. When you're looking for information on error codes, you got to do a lot of digging."
"There are certain restrictions on API integrations, and it is not simple or straightforward."
"The solution can be a little slow due to the Silverlight feature."
"Solution could use more inbuilt applications."
"If you need to integrate the RSA products with another SEIM solution, then it doesn't work properly."
"There should be a way to export and get data from the system in PDF or PowerPoint presentation format. This would be a great addition."
"GUI could be improved."
"There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue."
Brinqa is ranked 11th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. Brinqa is rated 7.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Brinqa writes "Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Brinqa is most compared with Vulcan Cyber, Axonius, Nucleus, Avalor and Tenable Nessus, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Workiva Wdesk and AuditBoard.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.