We performed a comparison between Broadcom Control Compliance Suite and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, IBM, MetricStream and others in IT Governance."I find the vulnerability assessment and asset prioritization feature valuable."
"The Advance Workflow feature simplifies things."
"The product is very flexible."
"RSA Archer has reduced the time and effort required for meetings."
"Easy to implement with a high level of automation."
"From my perspective, because I've always done it as a consultant, I do like the way it is configured. They've gone into changing the application builder interface, so it is even easier. When you're working with users, it is really easy to show them how to do things quickly and how to configure, change, and design stuff quickly."
"RSA is a very rich application. I like its adaptive suggestion, where based on your users and the class of data, it can actually recommend you the proper control to choose. For example, we have been using PCI DSS as an NIST. So based on application feedback, it will provide you with a suggestion on which control objective needs to be set. Based on that, you can make a decision—you don't need to take the suggestion, but you can customize that particular provided suggestion. RSA Archer's workflow is also good, in terms of process automation."
"It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks helps us understand it better and verify its compliance."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"The support mechanism can be improved."
"The financial area of RSA Archer has room for improvement."
"Its customization features could be better."
"The technology's a little outdated."
"I would like to have the ability to build and maintain an inventory of personal data processing activities and assets utilizing a purpose-built taxonomy and data structure."
"Some areas are not truly automated but are only scheduled."
"It would be nice if RSA Archer featured more customization. When customers are updating, they should be notified whether certain updates are optional. The install screen should not proceed to the next page unless we make some selections about which updates we want to install."
"The ticket handling process could be improved."
"There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue."
More Broadcom Control Compliance Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Broadcom Control Compliance Suite is ranked 8th in IT Governance while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in IT Governance with 38 reviews. Broadcom Control Compliance Suite is rated 8.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Control Compliance Suite writes "A good security tool for vulnerability assessment and asset prioritization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Broadcom Control Compliance Suite is most compared with , whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Workiva Wdesk and AuditBoard.
See our list of best IT Governance vendors.
We monitor all IT Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.