We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and Puppet Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."It works constantly and is pretty seamless. You do not have to open up many support tickets."
"It's very easy to work with. The learning curve is not that steep."
"The CA workload agent has gotten much better. For our organization it's important for us to communicate in a secure fashion between the host and the other platforms, and we are able to do that with our CA product"
"Without this product we would have to manually submit jobs and it would take longer. There would also be a much greater possibility of jobs running wrong and/or not at the right time."
"The scheduling feature allows us to know when jobs are going to run and makes sure they run in the order needed."
"It is a fairly stable solution."
"It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good."
"It has helped to simplify cross-dependency between MVS and Open systems jobs."
"Anything that we manage through Puppet always runs perfectly."
"Puppet3 and 4 series provides optimum deployment solutions for infrastructure and applications."
"Puppet Enterprise is a stable solution."
"Puppet Enterprise has good functionalities."
"The main purpose for this automation tool would be: deploying, controlling, ordering change for the system and IT Infrastructure."
"Puppet Enterprise has reduced the time of production changes or environment changes."
"The versatility is great."
"The most valuable features are the agent, high load balancing, and overall robustness and features."
"The GUI/Workstation is weak and needs to be improved. CA is working on this right now."
"This product needs to improve its graphical user interface."
"SQL server clustering is not supported."
"Ease of implementation for upgrades."
"We had a few issues, however, the issues were more on the infrastructure rather than with the application itself."
"I would like to see the Service Orchestrator, a B2B product, and maybe a process audit."
"It lacks support and integration with cloud computing platforms."
"The solution could improve by having support for container environments."
"The solution has really complex code, you have to understand the Ruby language. However, once you know the code then you can move ahead without any problems."
"We would like Puppet to add more integration for applications."
"Puppet Enterprise is more complex and difficult to configure."
"There's a lot of scope for enhancement on the DevSecOps side. They should definitely include features for compliance, for both the Linux and Windows side of the devices, as well as for network devices. Compliance is something they need to work on."
"Puppet Enterprise should improve the general extensibility for places where they can't install it."
"It's a bit of a pain point to make sure that everything works once we've upgraded it because Puppet has been evolving pretty fast."
"At the beginning the initial setup was kind of complex."
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while Puppet Enterprise doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Workload Automation with 12 reviews. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while Puppet Enterprise is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Puppet Enterprise writes "A set-it-and-forget-it management solution". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation, whereas Puppet Enterprise is most compared with AWS Systems Manager, Red Hat Satellite, Microsoft Configuration Manager, BigFix and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.