CloverETL vs Quest SharePlex comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Javlin Logo
287 views|245 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Quest Software Logo
2,703 views|1,739 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Quest SharePlex based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"No dependence on native language and ease of use.​​""Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages.""Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use.""Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

More CloverETL Pros →

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent.""There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target.""The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient.""Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously.""I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

More Quest SharePlex Pros →

Cons
"Its documentation could be improved.​""​Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough.​""Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

More CloverETL Cons →

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication.""For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison.""I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us.""I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement.""I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

More Quest SharePlex Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."
  • "It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."
  • More Quest SharePlex Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool.
    Top Answer:I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement.
    Top Answer:We use SharePlex to migrate and update from one data center to another. It's helpful for DR and broadcasting solutions. The main use case is to minimize downtime for migration or upgrade. The second… more »
    Ranking
    60th
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    287
    Comparisons
    245
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    24th
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    2,703
    Comparisons
    1,739
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,441
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Dell SharePlex, SharePlex
    Learn More
    Overview
    CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

    SharePlex database replication empowers your organization to achieve its database goals now and into the future. Make use of built-in monitoring, conflict resolution, data comparison and synchronization capabilities backed by award-winning support.

    Sample Customers
    IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA
    Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Integration
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CloverETL is ranked 60th in Data Integration while Quest SharePlex is ranked 24th in Data Integration with 5 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Quest SharePlex is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest SharePlex writes "It reduces the downtime and migration time exponentially". CloverETL is most compared with iWay Universal Adapter Framework, Talend Open Studio and SSIS, whereas Quest SharePlex is most compared with Oracle GoldenGate, AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Oracle Enterprise Manager and Fivetran.

    See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.