We performed a comparison between CockroachDB and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations."
"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."
"The product has valuable security features."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."
"CockroachDB is highly reliable."
"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."
"The initial setup and deployment are simple."
"The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good."
"The most valuable feature is the data aggregation function."
"It's easy to use."
"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to use and implement."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The product is good for tuning."
"The stability of the solution is very good. I wouldn't have used it for the past seven years if I was not satisfied."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is flexible and is an open-source product."
"The most valuable aspect of the product is data migration."
"The platform could be more extensible."
"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."
"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."
"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."
"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."
"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."
"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."
"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."
"The technical support is in need of improvement."
"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service's scalability is an area of concern that can be better."
"Integrating business intelligence or NLP solutions would help us save time and would prevent us from having to take a deep dive. Data problems seem to multiply on the system when you interact with it. Automation would save a lot of man-hours."
"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."
"The product has many bugs."
"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."
"Improvement could be made in the workflow, particularly when it comes to making changes or implementing certain functions."
"The solution should offer memory management."
CockroachDB is ranked 9th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is ranked 11th in Relational Databases Tools with 15 reviews. CockroachDB is rated 8.0, while Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service writes "A stable solution that can be used to perform on-premises to cloud migrations". CockroachDB is most compared with Oracle Database, MySQL, Citus Data, Amazon Aurora and SQL Server, whereas Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is most compared with Amazon Aurora, MySQL, Firebird SQL, Percona Server and PostgreSQL. See our CockroachDB vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
