Compare Comodo cWatch vs. R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll)

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Amazon, Fortinet and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: October 2020.
442,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
442,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
Top Answer: The three most valuable features that I noticed are the geo-localization of the user, the IP reputation, and the compartmental analysis.
Top Answer: The area that should be improved is licensing. When using an active/passive cluster, we have to pay 70% of the master appliance and license for the passive server that does not work. Since we know… more »
Ranking
Views
1,118
Comparisons
784
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
136
Avg. Rating
10.0
Views
285
Comparisons
222
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
479
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
cWatchRohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
Learn
Comodo
Rohde & Schwarz
Overview

Cwatch delivers robust website protection from hackers - while it helps you stay calm when online. It does not just stop with protection but helps in scanning the website to remove malware instantly. It is a complete website security tool that delivers state-of-the-art protection techniques to ensure SMB website security from simple to complex threat landscape. It ensures early threat detection, instant solution and sophisticated preventive measures.

Beyond the basic capabilities of traditional negative and positive security models, DenyAll’s scoring mechanism, user behavior tracking and advanced detection engines deliver best-of-breed security that won’t let you down. None of our customers have made the headlines with security breaches.

Web Services and automated machine-to-machine communications support business processes, internal and with ecosystem partners that are often critical. DenyAll makes it easy to optimize and secure these XML-based data flows, with capabilities found in no other WAF or SOA Gateway.

Offer
Learn more about Comodo cWatch
Learn more about R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll)
Sample Customers
Xerox, Intel, HP, UPS, Western Union, Western Digital
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Amazon, Fortinet and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: October 2020.
442,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comodo cWatch is ranked 14th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 15th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. Comodo cWatch is rated 10.0, while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Website malware removal was clean and perfect". On the other hand, the top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". Comodo cWatch is most compared with Cloudflare, Sucuri, SiteLock and Imperva Incapsula, whereas R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, Fortinet FortiWeb and PerimeterX Bot Defender.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.