We performed a comparison between Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] and Juniper SRX Series Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Netgate, Fortinet, OPNsense and others in Firewalls."From the firewall perspective, the rules and policies are very sufficient and easy to use."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"Fortinet FortiGate has many valuable features, such as IDS, and intrusion detection. It has security features that are in part with the technologies that are available in the market."
"Security solution with a straightforward and quick setup. It's a stable and scalable product."
"We've found the solution to be pretty stable."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiGate are the ability to work in proxy mode, which other solutions, such as Palo Alto cannot. There are some features that are better that come at no extra license or subscriptions cost, such as basic SD-WAN. The DLT is useful, other solutions have the same feature too, such as Palo Alto."
"It is a good source for firewall protection."
"The product is easy to use and is stable. The SV1 functionality is a benefit."
"This solution is user-friendly."
"Most of our clients use it as a traditional firewall, blocking Layer 3 and Layer 4, blocking by transport."
"Juniper supports their products very well."
"CLI: Junos CLI is very easy to use, and it is also very easy to find back items in the configuration and to change them."
"It protects from distributed denial-of-service attacks with Screen Options."
"Technical support has been quite helpful."
"The setup is pretty straightforward."
"The reason that we picked Juniper SRX is for the scalability, the fit for purpose, the tools that are available, the ongoing support and the ability to monitor, but particularly for the virtual routers in our data centers so that we can quickly upscale them when needed, when we need more throughput."
"The main features are safeguarding their data and ensuring robust security services for organizational data."
"There were quite a few problems with the stability of the system."
"Fortinet FortiGate is not very easy to use. The navigation could be improved to make it easier to use."
"Due to its higher cost, Fortinet FortiGate can lead to increased operational expenses."
"The debugging and troubleshooting has room for improvement."
"They are doing good, but they can improve the distributor assignment. The availability of the product and the timeline of delivery are the main things. The distribution should be swift, and the distributor should not reach out to end customers directly. They should work as a distributor. There should also be one more local distributor. Currently, there is only one distributor in Pakistan, and the rest of them are in UAE. It is difficult to work with only one distributor. Sometimes, you don't get along with the same distributor, and that's why they should have one more distributor. Their licensing should also be improved. The activation or renewal of the product should be done from the date of renewal, not from the date on which the license expired."
"The feedback that I have received is that the performance could be better, and the user experience is not as good compared to a previous solution we used. It could be more user-friendly. Of course, it still works fine for our operations."
"Fortinet FortiGate could improve by having better visibility. Palo Alto has better visibility."
"In the future, I would like to see improvements made to cloud-based management."
"I haven't seen any feature that will allow me direct authentication for a VPN solution."
"The solution isn't very granular or detailed."
"The user interface and the GUI need improvement."
"As a networking person, I don't really have any major issues with this device. Based on my experience of using it in a cluster, it could be more stable. I had an incident when one of the SRXs in a cluster couldn't learn ARP. It is a good solution, but firewalls don't seem to be an area of development for Juniper. They are focusing on data centers, routers, and switches, not firewalls."
"The interface could be more user-friendly."
"When I was going to upgrade the OS, the solution didn't accept certain USB devices."
"There are a lot of features that customers do not know about and I think that better documentation would help when it comes to learning how to use the product."
"Sometimes committing configurations takes a lot of time in Juniper because of the connections, and it could be a little bit faster."
"Both the web management and the graphical user interface are inadequate and should be improved."
Earn 20 points
Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Firewalls while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is ranked 19th in Firewalls with 18 reviews. Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper SRX Series Firewall writes "Useful telecom industry functionality, simple deployment, but lacking features". Comodo Dome Firewall [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Juniper SRX Series Firewall is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Netgate pfSense, Check Point NGFW and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors and best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.