Compare Conformiq vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Conformiq Logo
719 views|430 comparisons
SmartBear TestComplete Logo
16,032 views|11,057 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: July 2021.
522,281 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The tool has the ability to integrate with various requirement management, test management, and version control tools.""Though optimized and automated test generation is the core functionality, the product's integration with other tools sets it apart."

More Conformiq Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the integration with Azure DevOps.""The most valuable feature of this solution is regression testing tools.""The solution helps improve the stability of our product. It also decreases the work of our manual quality assurance engineers.""The solution is great as a record and playback tool. It also has valuable regression testing.""Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well.""The reporting is ready to use and doesn't require any setup.""The most valuable features are the desktop and mobile modules.""TestComplete is simple, it's a very easy-to-use tool."

More SmartBear TestComplete Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see the output data optionally used as input for the model, as further action in the flow.""It would be helpful to have a feature in the tool's UI to map object locators within the system.""Even though the 4.1 version is a far-improved version from its earlier avatars, the performance of test generation is still an issue on real-time models we have."

More Conformiq Cons »

"What is currently missing from this solution is better support for mobile testing.""The artificial intelligence needs to be improved.""The solution needs Mac OS support. Right now, the solution has only been developed to accommodate Windows OS.""The solution needs more training manuals or some form of online forum for learning. It needs more documentation.""The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS.""The test object repository needs to be improved. The hierarchy and the way we identify the objects in different applications, irrespective of technology, needs adjustments. The located and test objects are not as flexible compared to other commercial tools.""The licensing costs are a little bit high and should be reduced.""Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work."

More SmartBear TestComplete Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team.""The option we chose was around $2,000 USD.""The licensing costs are in the range of $1,000 to $3,000.""The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.""Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.""The pricing is a little above average — it could be lower."

More SmartBear TestComplete Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
522,281 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Though optimized and automated test generation is the core functionality, the product's integration with other tools sets it apart.
Top Answer: Test Cases can be generated with a local system as the server. However, depending on the number of models and their size, it is better to set up a system with higher RAM and a faster processor and use… more »
Top Answer: Though I understand every tool will have limitations, an effort can be put in to better understand and acknowledge the issues (not every issue is a problem with Conformiq) encountered in real-time… more »
Top Answer: In TestComplete, I saw a conformed package of a tool that kept everybody in consistency. The team was able to regenerate further tests without having to manipulate more code because the record feature… more »
Top Answer: The solution doesn't have a very flexible pricing model.
Top Answer: I was going to say load and performance but I really didn't get a chance to get into the load and performance part of TestComplete. I can sense there's still a little bit more room for improvement in… more »
Ranking
11th
Views
719
Comparisons
430
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
607
Rating
8.0
3rd
Views
16,032
Comparisons
11,057
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
478
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Conformiq Creator, Conformiq Transformer
Learn More
Overview

Conformiq Creator provides a solution for automating testing processes and speeding up the software development lifecycle of Enterprise IT applications. Conformiq Creator is used in various sectors, including Telecom, Banking, Finance, Insurance, Retail, and Public Sector services. Launched initially in 2013, Creator quickly gained popularity among its users for its functional testing, application testing, system testing, and end-to-end testing.

Conformiq Transformer shortens the path to test automation, simplifies model-based testing (MBT) adoption using existing methods, and automates manual test execution. Along with Conformiq Creator, which generates executable test cases, scripts and documentation from models, it automates and transforms test design, extending the Conformiq 360° Test Automation™ solution for complex system testing at the speed of development.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Offer
Learn more about Conformiq
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
Alcatel-Lucent, Avaya, Daimler, Ericsson
Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company53%
Financial Services Firm14%
Manufacturing Company11%
Insurance Company5%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company29%
Manufacturing Company10%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider14%
Manufacturing Company7%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise35%
Large Enterprise44%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: July 2021.
522,281 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Conformiq is ranked 11th in Test Management Tools with 3 reviews while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 3rd in Test Automation Tools with 13 reviews. Conformiq is rated 8.0, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Conformiq writes "Feature-rich stable tool with multiple options to control output, good integration with other tools, and knowledgeable support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Speed, configuration consistency, and accuracy of tests with fantastic results". Conformiq is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Cognizant ADPART and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT One, Katalon Studio, Ranorex Studio and Appium.

See our list of .

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.