We performed a comparison between Delinea Privileged Access Service and One Identity Safeguard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution provides secure access to environments."
"The vault and auditing capabilities are the most valuable feature because they include multiple reports that allow us to create our own reports."
"The most valuable feature of Delinea Privileged Access Service is we can use the server as a jump host. It is simple to manage the accounts on the system."
"This is a cloud-based application, which makes it very easy to deploy."
"There are benefits in the security realm. We use Delinea at an enterprise level. I imagine there are productivity gains, but moreover, it's the security. We don’t enable staff to see the passwords of boxes but it's all being tracked and logged now."
"The privileged account management feature is what I like most."
"The solution is flexible."
"The reporting is excellent."
"We are able to log and get reporting on all privileged activity that is being performed. We like the fact that we can leverage the session recording feature, which is especially valuable when we're dealing with third-party vendors that have to remote into our our boxes and servers to do any work on behalf of the bank. Now, we can record everything they are doing to ensure that they're only doing the changes that were needed. In addition, we use it to leverage knowledge transfer with our internal staff."
"Safeguard has the ability to record and retrieve in the full-video format."
"One Identity Safeguard is stable and provides great performance."
"The most unique and valuable features are the upstream and downstream throughput capacities; the Safeguard platform provides agile integration. In actuality, all the features are valuable. They're good, user-friendly."
"We don't need to use VPN for remote access."
"The transparent mode for privileged sessions is a very good solution."
"It is generally easy-to-use and install."
"I like that One Identity Safeguard lets you configure the maximum number of connections to the target, a configuration I didn't find in its competitor."
"Enhancing the solution by incorporating additional features to make it comprehensive would be beneficial. It would be more convenient to have a complete package solution that consolidates all the features in one place, making it easier to manage. Currently, I am required to access two separate servers for reports, which could be avoided if all the necessary features were available in a single location. This would be highly advantageous for managing everything effectively."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"The integration with sync could be improved."
"There needs to be a notification when a password is near expiration."
"This solution needs better integration with third-party solutions because their ability to support other tools is very weak."
"The pricing and presence could be improved."
"Although the interface is intuitive, it could be a little more user-friendly."
"With Delinea Privileged Access Service, when installing the identity connectors to configure with AD, the configuration was not happening properly."
"From a usability perspective, what we are finding out is that our privileged domain admin users, in particular, want functionality for extending a checkout session. So we are working with One Identity support to see if there's an enhancement that can be made to the product."
"We have issues using Safeguard to connect to and record from the cloud. Currently, they don't have a mechanism to record this type of connection."
"On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight."
"The main point regarding the user experience is that Safeguard has two separate management consoles."
"Something for One Identity to look at is having integration guidelines for how to logically group accounts."
"I would like to see support for RDP over HTTPS so this product can be used in conjunction with the Microsoft terminal."
"We currently have a problem with the Active Directory integrations on Windows. Some of our users need to be logged with Active Directory, but we are having communication issues between One Identity and Active Directory. It seems that Active Directory is not well-integrated."
"We would like to have the option of importing assets by using the CSV file. It was available in the earlier versions, but it is not available now."
More Delinea Privileged Access Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Delinea Privileged Access Service is ranked 12th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 10 reviews while One Identity Safeguard is ranked 5th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 38 reviews. Delinea Privileged Access Service is rated 8.0, while One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Delinea Privileged Access Service writes "Very cost-effective and provides secure access to environments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Provides us with centralized storage of secrets and credentials, and visibility into the use of privileged access". Delinea Privileged Access Service is most compared with Azure Key Vault, Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management, Delinea Secret Server and SAP Identity Management, whereas One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, WALLIX Bastion, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and IBM Security QRadar. See our Delinea Privileged Access Service vs. One Identity Safeguard report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.