We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"The out-of-box integration between Oracle and SAP is really beneficial"
"OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces."
"The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like us"
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"The dashboard provided by Oracle Integration Cloud for monitoring and error handling is very intuitive."
"The solution is scalable."
"OIC's accuracy is quite good."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
"Lacks features for more complex integrations."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"Make it more similar to the on-premises features. For example, if you can edit the code directly rather than just dragging and dropping, or if you can edit the examples by going into the background, and one-click migration, I'd like to see included in the next release."
"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"While most of the adapters are available through Oracle Integration Cloud Services, they do not have a lot of features. I would like to see some enrichment in this area and for the solution to go deeper into the applications and upgrade the adapters."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Azure Data Factory and AWS Glue, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate and SSIS. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
