Compare Digital Guardian vs. Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention

Digital Guardian is ranked 4th in Data Loss Prevention with 3 reviews while Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention is ranked 5th in Data Loss Prevention with 5 reviews. Digital Guardian is rated 7.0, while Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Digital Guardian writes "The classification engine enables you to set up inspection rules to determine whether data has PII". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention writes "Malware scanning and intrusion detection features enable us to find out who is on our servers and what they have done". Digital Guardian is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and CrowdStrike, whereas Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Digital Guardian. See our Digital Guardian vs. Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Digital Guardian vs. Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability.In Digital Guardian, they have the cloud correlation servers that give you visibility work like EBR and the correlation server works very well for security analysis.The technical support is really terrific.

Read more »

The interface and dashboard are okay.The most values feature of this solution are the micro DLP features.Trend Micro has improved my client's organization by recovering malware disabled network adaptors from servers.We find the malware scanning and intrusion detection most valuable for our server management requirements. We can find out who is on our servers and what they have done.We are able to check the log and keep records.

Read more »

Cons
There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great.The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel.I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated.

Read more »

It's hard for me to answer any questions about missing features. It's the outside companies who support us that manage this DLP solution at this moment.Being able to specify an agent list, or client list, to allow support from outside of the organization, would be of benefit to this solution.Trend Micro could be priced better, currently, it's a bit high. And there needs to be better after the sale, technical support.I would like to provide improved network direction in order to regulate all of the user agents. We only use Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention to manage various threats and malicious user agents currently.Needs a remote login option.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions.If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price.

Read more »

The licensing and pricing of Trend Micro are comparatively low and competitive since they are offered in a bundle, especially compared to Symantec, which was has a relatively high price.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
3,936
Comparisons
2,439
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
847
Avg. Rating
7.0
5th
Views
1,131
Comparisons
718
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
373
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 8% of the time.
Learn
Digital Guardian
Trend Micro
Overview

Digital Guardian Endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data on all your endpoints. It protects intellectual property and personal information. An endpoint agent that captures and records all system, user and data events on or off the network. It has a granular control of all data movement that can be configured to automatically block, justify or encrypt sensitive data in or attached to email, files moved to removable drives, cloud storage, or web - malware and malware-free - before sensitive data is lost. It has a built-in advanced data classification that creates and modifies classification and usage policies through content inspection, context-awareness and user classification. It provides design policies with controls that won't block actions that comply with corporate policy so employees remain productive while the data stays safe.

Trend Micro Integrated DLP minimizes the complexity and cost of data security by integrating DLP functionality directly into your existing Trend Micro solutions and management consoles.
Offer
Learn more about Digital Guardian
Learn more about Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention
Sample Customers
The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil CircuitExcite Japan, MEDHOST, United Way of Greater Atlanta, University of Florida at Shands
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company32%
Comms Service Provider15%
Media Company8%
Government6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Digital Guardian vs. Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.