"It's a product with a swarm of different applications, each one answers the needs of a specific part of the business. They collaborate one with each other relatively smoothly."
"EMC's documentation team has put a lot of effort into its literature, and the documentation and installation guides are simply superb."
"Being able to search is valuable. Its search is pretty powerful. We are able to search for specific text, and it points us to the document that has that text. That is pretty powerful."
"The solution's automatic document numbering, state management, and process flow are very useful features to go through the full cycle of the document."
"Most of our customers are very fond of the upgraded smart user interface."
"Scalability is great. We can extend areas horizontally and vertically."
"The tool's most valuable features are document storage, security, and compliance."
"Being able to tag metadata on documents and being able to have different workspaces in there for our documents is valuable. We do loan documents, and different types of documents have different types of retentions. We are able to categorize based on that, and we are able to do tag searching to find what we are looking for."
"It's a very good solution."
"We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where everything is. Being able to use that on top of the Content Server was a big help."
"I would say scalability is a hot point to improve."
"The main work to do concerns cloud integration because our customers want to go to the cloud."
"The initial setup can get really complicated, and it takes time."
"I have not used it enough to start running into issues. Some of my technical guys could name a couple of things, but in terms of support, we did have challenges getting good responses from them."
"We are looking for new, advanced UI features. Currently, the UI does not look great."
"User interface needs improvement (at least in the version we are using, desktop client)."
"The solution's performance, stability, and consistency could be improved."
"When it comes to addressing complex use cases, three or four years ago, we ended up purchasing an additional OpenText product called AppWorks because we started to run into some limitations with the workflow that can be done in Extended ECM. It was a little limiting, so we ended up getting another product."
"We had some issues with scalability in the production. So, I would rate it a five out of ten."
"Initially there can be stability issues due to unknown factors such as usage of the system, quantity of documents ingested, load during peak hours."
More Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Digital Asset Management while OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews. Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.6, while OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A swarm of applications for varying business demands, but scalability needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with Aprimo and Adobe Workfront, whereas OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Alfresco and Hyland OnBase.
We monitor all Digital Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.