"It's a product with a swarm of different applications, each one answers the needs of a specific part of the business. They collaborate one with each other relatively smoothly."
"EMC's documentation team has put a lot of effort into its literature, and the documentation and installation guides are simply superb."
"Simplicity to roll out, features available, customization options."
"The integration of a document management platform with many other applications, e.g. SAP, SuccessFactors, Salesforce, SharePoint, etc."
"Most of our customers are very fond of the upgraded smart user interface."
"Retention is useful. I have been pleased with the search functionality and the extensibility for tying it into integrations with other systems and building workflows on top of it."
"We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where everything is. Being able to use that on top of the Content Server was a big help."
"The solution's automatic document numbering, state management, and process flow are very useful features to go through the full cycle of the document."
"We can configure the solution with any industry's products per customer requirements."
"Smart Viewing videos are most valuable for the end users. The end users like the look and feel of Smart View. It's similar to SharePoint, with the latest HTML5 features, filters, and everything. It's like online shopping."
"I would say scalability is a hot point to improve."
"The main work to do concerns cloud integration because our customers want to go to the cloud."
"The solution should work better with partners and be more developer-friendly."
"The tool's documentation is not proper and has missing information like steps."
"The solution's performance, stability, and consistency could be improved."
"When it comes to addressing complex use cases, three or four years ago, we ended up purchasing an additional OpenText product called AppWorks because we started to run into some limitations with the workflow that can be done in Extended ECM. It was a little limiting, so we ended up getting another product."
"There are no additional features that I would like to see. I am pretty happy with it, but their support could be a bit better."
"I have not used it enough to start running into issues. Some of my technical guys could name a couple of things, but in terms of support, we did have challenges getting good responses from them."
"The solution needs to improve the user interface."
"Initially there can be stability issues due to unknown factors such as usage of the system, quantity of documents ingested, load during peak hours."
More Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Digital Asset Management while OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews. Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.6, while OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A swarm of applications for varying business demands, but scalability needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". Documentum Digital Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with Aprimo, whereas OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Digital Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.