We compared Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT and Eaton UPS based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
In summary, Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT users praise its reliability, power capacity, scalability, user-friendly interface, and cost-effectiveness. However, issues with maintenance, software compatibility, noise levels, user interface, and battery lifespan are noted. Meanwhile, Eaton UPS users value its reliability, power backup efficiency, integration, interface, and durability. Suggestions for improvement include enhancing efficiency, power consumption, user interface, durability, reliability, customer support, and adding advanced features.
Features: In terms of valuable features, the Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT is praised for its reliability, power capacity, scalability, smooth transition during power outages, intuitive management interface, and valuable support. On the other hand, the Eaton UPS is highly regarded for its reliable performance, efficient power backup, seamless integration, intuitive interface, superior durability, consistent operation, uninterrupted power supply, data protection, convenience in system integration, user-friendly interface, and robust build quality.
Pricing and ROI: The Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT product has been praised for its fair pricing and reasonable setup cost, as well as a seamless licensing process. On the other hand, users have also expressed satisfaction with the affordability and straightforward setup cost of the Eaton UPS product, along with a hassle-free licensing process., The Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT offers reliable performance and substantial cost savings, with high efficiency and easy scalability. Users appreciate its uninterrupted power delivery and efficient customer support. On the other hand, the Eaton UPS provides a significant ROI with increased power efficiency and reliable performance. Users find it worth the investment due to its high-quality build, durability, and improved power management capabilities.
Room for Improvement: The Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT can improve in areas such as maintenance requirements, software compatibility, noise levels, user interface, and battery lifespan. In contrast, users suggest that the Eaton UPS could benefit from improved efficiency, power consumption, user interface, durability, reliability, customer support, and advanced features.
Deployment and customer support: The user feedback for Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT indicates varying duration for deployment and setup, with one user taking three months for deployment and an additional week for setup. Eaton UPS users also reported similar timeframes, but context suggests deployment and setup periods may overlap., Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT has reliable customer service, as users have commended the assistance and guidance provided by their representatives. Eaton UPS also offers great support with prompt assistance and expertise in issue resolution. Both companies prioritize customer satisfaction.
The summary above is based on 3 interviews we conducted recently with Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT and Eaton UPS users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The fact that they're reliable and that they notify us whenever the line power drops are the only things we really need. All of our UPS's have been available and up whenever power outages have happened."
"It's also very important that it's a rack-mountable, three-phase UPS. Some of the equipment we run requires a three-phase, such as HPE BladeSystems and some of the Cisco core devices."
"Their service and their relationship with their customers is their biggest value, absolutely, compared to the competitors that I've dealt with... the service organization of Eaton is one of their strongest points."
"The most valuable feature is that they work. They've been really reliable for us. They come as advertised. There is also a nice network feature that allows us to monitor them."
"We have utilized the building-block nature of the solution as we have grown. We can add modules, which helps from a cost standpoint and protects the initial capital investment in the system, rather than having to completely replace the system. We can start small scale and incrementally fund additional capacity as needed rather than purchasing a system, having to pull it out, and buying a brand new one."
"The most valuable feature is the control... we couldn't live life without [PredictPulse]. It does add a level of comfort knowing that PredictPulse is telling us about potential errors before they happen. My preference is to keep it in ESS mode. It saves me a good amount of money."
"The two things that I like are the ESS, its related components, and the bypass sync, which means if there's a problem with the UPS I can mechanically wrap around it without going to static bypass. Eaton has one of the few units on the market that will do that."
"The battery life seems to be pretty good. I don't have a lot of experience with other units of its size, but it does a good job of keeping our unit up."
"You can scale it by adding batteries."
"Stability is one of the key points. The durability and lifetime of the product are also notable."
"I like it because we don't have any problems."
"We have not had a lot of issues over the many years we have been using the solution."
"I would like to see there is a little more clarity on what the issue is on the notifications that we receive. This would make it easier for us. What we have to do now is sometimes go to the UPS to figure out exactly what the issue is, because it's not always clear."
"I want to monitor remotely and that is a complaint I have... The remote monitoring software they have does not provide the same information that the touch screen provides and neither provide me the same information that the field techs can draw out of the unit when they directly connect to them."
"The external monitoring solution could use further enhancements. I'm thinking of business continuity. If an internal legacy monitoring solution goes down, and it has no one to connect to the outside world, then it can't send out an alert. How are we going to be able to determine that there is a problem with that UPS if it loses network connectivity?"
"I think the batteries are based on lead-acid technology so they have to be replaced every five years, but with the new lithium-ion battery technology that is available, it might be good if, at some point, they updated their battery technology."
"The industry is going to a smaller footprint, but that does come at a cost, specifically for battery reserve time, size and density of the system, and BTU generation. Those three areas contribute to the heat generation factor. I think that they've done a really good job. But, when you look across our infrastructure, it's the UPS system that takes up the most space of any of our products."
"The battery life of the older batteries is the only thing that has been our issue up to this point. Luckily, the Cellwatch system that is on there identifies it and notifies us ahead of time when we should get them changed pretty quickly. This may be addressed with the lithium-ion batteries, but it is too early in our ownership of a UPS with a lithium-ion battery to know."
"If they could reduce the footprint even more, that would be great. And they could always make heat dissipation better."
"Outside of a full-service contract, my only concern is technician availability for repairs. Where we don't have a full-service contract with them, which unfortunately is the larger portion of our equipment from them, we're just like anybody else, waiting for a slot for a technician to arrive."
"Schneider's vendor, I believe, needs to be more involved with the customer. We have to constantly look for them because they don't come to me. I have to go there, and I don't want to. I don't want to waste time looking for a vendor. We require immediate attention."
"We have been having some issues with the solutions controller and we are having problems finding spare parts."
"The duration of the batteries could be much better."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
More Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT Pricing and Cost Advice →
Eaton UPS is ranked 2nd in Data Center Power Solutions while Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT is ranked 1st in Data Center Power Solutions with 5 reviews. Eaton UPS is rated 9.0, while Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Eaton UPS writes "Company value is more than the product. It is their people Eaton's great product and people keep bringing me back". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT writes "Easy to manage, reliable, and worth the price". Eaton UPS is most compared with Liebert NX, Schneider Electric-APC Symmetra PX, Gamatronic Mega Power+, Tripplite SmartPro and PowerPlug, whereas Schneider Electric-APC Smart-UPS VT is most compared with Liebert NX, MGE Galaxy, Emerson Network Power Npower, Schneider Electric-APC Symmetra PX and Tripplite SmartPro.
See our list of best Data Center Power Solutions vendors.
We monitor all Data Center Power Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
