We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and PingID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Authentication Systems solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It integrates very tightly with the rest of the Fortinet ecosystem."
"Intuitive interface and easy to deploy."
"The product is good, cost-effective, and functionally efficient."
"The logs have great detail that make it easier to evaluate and control the security environment."
"Fulfilled our requirement at a good price."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is an easy-to-use solution."
"For someone concerned with multifactor authentication, I'm satisfied with the product."
"FortiAuthenticator is easy to use."
"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."
"This is a user-friendly solution."
"It provides ease of connecting all our devices."
"It's pretty stable as a product."
"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."
"What I like best about PingID is that it's very user-friendly. PingID is well-built as a developer tool and regularly upgrades and updates via patches. I also like that PingID has clear documents that will help you integrate it with other solutions."
"The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches."
"We use the product to run different reports."
"A better integration with other vendors."
"Other features that would improve the product are a single sign-on where people can use their Gmail ID to log-in, etc."
"Improvements in the product could start from the dashboard, overall customization, and configuration."
"Integration with some other enterprise applications could be improved."
"The hardware aspect of the solution could be improved. We are not really able to understand the hardware capabilities of the device."
"The user interface and clustering are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"The integration with third-party tools must be better."
"The technical support team is bad."
"I think that the connection with like Microsoft Word, especially for Office 365, is a weak point that could be improved."
"The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings."
"The product is not customizable."
"PingID classifies the type of environment into internal and external, which is an area for improvement because you need to take additional steps to trust internal and external users."
"PingID would benefit from a better user interface for integration."
"It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution."
"In the beginning, the initial setup was very complex."
"PingID's device management portal should be more easily accessible via a link. They provide no link to the portal like they do for the service. The passwordless functionality could be more comprehensive. You can't filter based on hardware devices. Having that filtering option would be great. Device authentication would be a great feature."
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 3rd in Authentication Systems with 52 reviews while PingID is ranked 7th in Authentication Systems with 14 reviews. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while PingID is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingID writes " A robust cloud-based multi-factor solution with a good customer support team". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas PingID is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock, PingFederate, SailPoint IdentityIQ and RSA SecurID. See our Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. PingID report.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.