Compare Fortinet FortiGate vs. Juniper SRX

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco ASA Firewall Logo
69,522 views|50,618 comparisons
Fortinet FortiGate Logo
169,085 views|121,397 comparisons
Juniper SRX Logo
22,240 views|18,008 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
MohamedElKashlan
Shashidhara B N
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiGate vs. Juniper SRX and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It is a comprehensive suite and complete package.""The integration and configuration were pretty straightforward.""The transparency of the single UI to ensure security. A product has to be simple so that an administrator can use it.""It provides security for our company and users.""Among the top features are integrated threat defence and the fact that each virtual appliance is separate so you get great granular control.""Its VPN and ASN features are very stable.""The setup was straightforward. I was happy with the configuration and deployment of the solution, as it was quick.""This solution has good security, and it's a good product. You can trust Cisco, and there's support as well, which is really good."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Pros »

"It has improved our security capabilities.""It is a good source for firewall protection.""It's a firewall that secures our internal network. I have been using it since 2013, and I find that most of the features are advanced, and very user friendly.""The most valuable feature is the bundled subscription, which is IPS, TV and web filtering.""It is easy to use and performs very well.""We use a southern institution that's audited for IT security and the reporting that automatically comes off the unit makes it much easier to meet compliance standards and makes it easier as far as the amount of time that has to be spent to compile that information. If you get your reporting set up correctly when you initially set it up, you just select the one you want and hit print. The auditing trail on it is the best feature.""We can use our devices to check all of the perimeters. It secures email websites.""I really like the captive portal feature for our guest network. It has nice VLAN features in terms of separating our network. The anti-virus is also good."

More Fortinet FortiGate Pros »

"From a protection perspective, it provides a network perimeter security function for our company.""It protects from distributed denial-of-service attacks with Screen Options.""Most of our clients use it as a traditional firewall, blocking Layer 3 and Layer 4, blocking by transport.""The virtualization feature is the most valuable feature. Sometimes customers are requesting a private connection using mobile data when they are connecting to remote sites.""On a scale from one to ten, one being the worst and ten being the best I'd give Juniper SRX an overall rating of eight because of its' competitive price.""There is a lot of flexibility in how you can commit, check, and back out of a configuration.""The most valuable feature is the virtualization because it can be used for customers who are using the mobile data network to request a private connection to a remote site.""The deployment is quite easy and fast."

More Juniper SRX Pros »

Cons
"Cisco ASA should be easier to use. It is a bit tough to navigate and see what is going on.""Even on a smaller scale, people are finding you need HA pairs, and there's no way that the ASA can do that, at least in the virtual version.""The artificial intelligence and machine learning (behavioral based threat detection), which I can this will be coming out in another year, these are what we need now.""The initial setup was complex.""There are always vulnerabilities that come up and there was one in early 2018 but this was patched with software updates.""In terms of next-generation capabilities, Cisco is a little behind, and it is way behind the market leaders.""The phishing emails could be improved.""There may have been one or two incidences of malicious threats."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Cons »

"There were quite a few problems with the stability of the system.""The UTM filtering needs improvement.""The web-cache feature which was previously on the FortiGate device, but was deleted with the recent upgrade should be returned. It was a very valuable feature for us.""I think they need to improve more in order to be a competitor with the leaders of the field.""There could be more integration between the logging and analytical platforms to make it more seamless and integrated.""They should make the rule sets more understandable for the end user. When you're trying to explain to somebody how a computer network is secured, sometimes it's difficult for an end user or customer to understand. If there was a way to make the terminology more accessible to the end user, the set up could be easier. They should translate the technical jargon to an easily relatable and understandable conversation for the end user, the customer, that would be brilliant. Particularly in an environment where the IT structure is audited regularly, there's always pressure from the auditor to up the standards and up the security and you get your USCERT's that come out and there's a warning about this and the customer will want to lock out so much and when you apply it they run into issue where they can't search the internet or print to their remote office. Of course they can't print to your remote office, they just locked it up. They should make the language more understandable for the customer. If there's a product out there that made the jargon understandable to John Q. Public, I would buy that.""They need to improve their technical support.""Some of the filtering is not robust, you can escape it with a VPN. Some of the users bypass some of the filters. It catches some but it also misses some, that area could be improved. It's functioning reasonably but there's room for improvement in that area."

More Fortinet FortiGate Cons »

"This solution needs to update for "Next Generation" needs.""The GUI needs to be easier and more helpful for users who don't have security experience.""it would be more powerful if Juniper brought out a security product other than the firewall, like anti-spam, endpoint protection, etc. Customers who want to deploy security solutions are not just thinking about firewalls... Juniper should have an end-to-end solution, from the endpoint to the network level.""The Juniper SRX product needs to improve in terms of innovation.""Improvements can be made to the GUI. The GUI can be improved by creating policies to handle IPS requirements. The configuration should be a one-step process. This would make it easier to complete the setup to register the time of operation.""It's a good stable firewall, but it's nowhere near what it needs to be for a next-generation type firewall.""The Juniper product has to improve in terms of innovation.""The GUI needs improvement."

More Juniper SRX Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Purchasing from the AWS Marketplace was easy. It was just point and click.""It is pay-as-you-go, so it much cheaper than buying in the plants.""Our individual release cycle has been quicker because the entire development and testing environment has been automated because of these virtual instances. It has aligned our development workflow. This is where we have seen the ROI increase.""With the Cisco ASA, you do get what you pay for. What would really be awesome is to see Cisco blow out a real cheap version where you can use the sandbox, but leave it step-wise and go to another product relatively easily, like getting you hooked on candy.""We are partners with Cisco. They are always one call away, which is good. They know how to keep their customers happy.""Pricing is high, but it is essentially a corporate decision.""Licensing is expensive compared to other solutions.""The cost is a big factor for us. This is why we are using it only in our restricted area. They are very much higher than their competitors in the market."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We find the most valuable aspect of this solution is the price. It is affordable, and cheaper than other firewalls.""It is an inexpensive solution.""It is cost-effective, and provides a good value for your money. The pricing, and license renewal, is very reasonable for us.""They need to be competitive with other solutions.""It is a good product from a price perspective versus functionality.""Price-wise, it's at a good price point for our market.""The initial setup is super straight forward and as far as the licensing goes for the small product that we have, the pricing was pretty competitive. It wasn't as simple and as cheap as a SonicWall but for the service we would get it was a good price.""Compared to Palo Alto, which we have used in the past, pricing and licensing are okay."

More Fortinet FortiGate Pricing and Cost Advice »

"In terms of pricing, Juniper is in the middle. The most expensive firewall is Palo Alto. If a customer wants the cheapest price they should go for FortiGate. Juniper is in between these products.""The direct support with Juniper is expensive. When you stop using the solution and miss one year of payments, if you want the support back on a specific node, they ask you to pay for the year that you haven't used the node.""The pricing is perhaps half, probably forty percent, of Cisco.""While the price of support is expensive, the price of the solution, itself, is not.""The price of this solution is more than other products, but it's stable, and the technical support is better than I have seen with others.""There was no additional licensing cost because there were no IPS services. It was just a firewall IP circuit router so they have the default licensing. We just need to renew the support yearly.""Compared to other vendors, the pricing of this solution is good."

More Juniper SRX Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: They provide DDoS protection and multi-factor authentication. That is a good option as it enables work-from-home… more »
Top Answer: In terms of costs, other solutions are more expensive than Cisco. Palo Alto is more expensive than Cisco.
Top Answer: From my experience regarding both the Sophos and FortiGate firewalls, I personally would rather use FortiGate. I know… more »
Top Answer: In my opinion and as a result of years of experience: - Both are great firewalls with excellent performance and a… more »
Top Answer: The difference is the poor performance that Fortigate has when it has all its services in use. Compare which customers… more »
Top Answer: The EEE security controls allow us to make policy restrictions, so I can customize port numbers to allow or limit… more »
Top Answer: When we first tested the serial interface on our model, it did not work. It should be easier to escalate support… more »
Top Answer: We use Juniper for EEE routing and we also use the gateway feature.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Firewall, Cisco ASA NGFW, Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA, Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls, Cisco ASAvFortiGate 60b, FortiGate 60c, FortiGate 80c, FortiGate 50b, FortiGate 200b, FortiGate 110c, FortiGateSRX
Learn
Cisco
Fortinet
Juniper
Overview

Cisco ASA firewalls deliver enterprise-class firewall functionality with highly scalable and flexible VPN capabilities to meet diverse needs, from small/branch offices to high performance data centers and service providers. Available in a wide range of models, Cisco ASA can be deployed as a physical or virtual appliance. Flexible VPN capabilities include support for remote access, site-to-site, and clientless VPN. Also, select appliances support clustering for increased performance, VPN load balancing to optimize available resources, advanced high availability configurations, and more.

Cisco ASAv is the virtualized version of the Cisco ASA firewall. Widely deployed in leading private and public clouds, Cisco ASAv is ideal for remote worker and multi-tenant environments. The solution scales up/down to meet performance requirements and high availability provides resilience. Also, Cisco ASAv can deliver micro-segmentation to protect east-west network traffic.

Cisco firewalls provide consistent security policies, enforcement, and protection across all your environments. Unified management for Cisco ASA and FTD/NGFW physical and virtual firewalls is delivered by Cisco Defense Orchestrator (CDO), with cloud logging also available. And with Cisco SecureX included with every Cisco firewall, you gain a cloud-native platform experience that enables greater simplicity, visibility, and efficiency.

Learn more about Cisco’s firewall solutions, including virtual appliances for public and private cloud.

The FortiGate family of NG firewalls provides proven protection with unmatched performance across the network, from internal segments, to data centers, to cloud environments. FortiGates are available in a large range of sizes and form factors and are key components of the Fortinet Security Fabric, which enables immediate, intelligent defense against known and new threats throughout the entire network.

High-performance security with advanced, integrated threat intelligence, delivered on the industry's most scalable and resilient platform. SRX Series gateways set new benchmarks with 100GbE interfaces and feature Express Path technology, which enables up to 1 Tbps performance for the data center.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco ASA Firewall
Learn more about Fortinet FortiGate
Learn more about Juniper SRX
Sample Customers
There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.Pittsburgh Steelers, LUSH Cosmetics, NASDAQ, Verizon, Arizona State University, Levi Strauss & Co. Whitepaper and case studies here7-Eleven, AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, alltours GmbH, Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Atlantech Online, Availity, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BancABC, BAS Group, Black Lotus, Blue Box, Borealis, Carilion Clinic, Catholic Health System, CATV, Champlain College, Chinas Ministry of Railways, China University of Mining and Technology (CUMT), Cloud Dynamics, CloudSeeds, Cloudwatt, CODONiS, Colt Technology Services, Cork Internet Exchange, CSS Versicherung AG, CyrusOne, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Department of Energy, Divona Telecom, DQE Communications, DreamHost, European Government Agency, Expedient, Financial Market Information Services Provider, Fluidata, Fonality, Fox Sports, Global Financial Institution, Global Investment Bank, Global Investment Company, Energy Sciences Network (ESnet), Goethe University, HEAnet, High Performance Networks Inc., Hillenbrand
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm19%
Comms Service Provider12%
Manufacturing Company11%
University6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider31%
Computer Software Company24%
Media Company5%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm10%
Media Company9%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider32%
Computer Software Company23%
Media Company5%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider52%
Financial Services Firm19%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Retailer5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider36%
Computer Software Company27%
Media Company5%
K 12 Educational Company Or School5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise40%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise49%
REVIEWERS
Small Business47%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise28%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business43%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise33%
REVIEWERS
Small Business44%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise39%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiGate vs. Juniper SRX and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
448,290 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fortinet FortiGate is ranked 1st in Firewalls with 66 reviews while Juniper SRX is ranked 10th in Firewalls with 18 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate is rated 8.6, while Juniper SRX is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate writes "Stable, easy to set up, and offers good ROI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper SRX writes "This best in class Next-Gen firewall is elegant in its ease-of-use and architecture". Fortinet FortiGate is most compared with Meraki MX, pfSense, Sophos UTM, Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall and Check Point NGFW, whereas Juniper SRX is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, pfSense, Meraki MX, Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall and Sophos XG. See our Fortinet FortiGate vs. Juniper SRX report.

See our list of best Firewalls vendors.

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.