Compare GitLab vs. JIRA Portfolio

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitLab Logo
5,575 views|4,884 comparisons
JIRA Portfolio Logo
3,132 views|1,923 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. JIRA Portfolio and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The dashboard and interface make it easy to use.""We like that we can create branches and then the branches can be reviewed and you can mesh those branches back. You can independently work with your own branch, you don't need to really control the core of other people.""Everything is easy to configure and easy to work with.""A user friendly solution.""It speeds up our development, it's faster, safer, and more convenient."

More GitLab Pros »

"The graphics and the resolution of the work are very good.""With JIRA, you can do amazing things by developing connectors, embedding features, and adding new fields to create new things.""The developers can simplify tasks and each one of them can undertake a task and then they continue with development. Our processes are more efficient and easier for our manager and developers to track them. Their work is more organized.""The dashboard is the most valuable feature. The user experience is very good, it's easy to use.""The product's centralized database creates a single source of data for working groups so no data needs to be reconciled.""The product makes it easy to collaborate even though it can use some improvement in that area.""The integration is very good. We've more or less integrated with everything including reporting and registering.""The customized workflows we can define are very valuable. JIRA's private projects is very useful as well. There are also a lot of plugins that they provide."

More JIRA Portfolio Pros »

Cons
"GitLab doesn't have AWS integration. It would be better to have integration with other container management environments beyond Kubernetes. It has very good integration with Kubernetes, but it doesn't have good integration with, for example, AWS, ETS, etc.""I would like to see static analysis also embedded in GitLab. That would also help us. If there's something that it does internally by GitLab and then that is already tied up with your pipeline and then it can tell you that you're coding is good or your code is not great. Based on that, it would pass or fail. That should be streamlined. I would think that would help to a greater extent, in terms of having one solution rather than depending on multiple vendors.""The only thing our company is really waiting on in terms of features is the development of metrics.""Reporting could be improved.""I would like to see better integration with project management tools such as Jira."

More GitLab Cons »

"If I get a feature but there is not a user story, and I want to know which epic it belongs to, it is really hard to figure out.""This solution is not able to be integrated with other solutions because you have to upgrade it and pay for more licensing.""I think that front-end development is a little bit buggy in some cases. Some of the features take a while to respond and some need to be more clear.""The initial setup could use improvement.""The product could do with more flexible reporting.""Some key features like integration, big data warehousing and data modeling need work.""The workflow needs improvement.""I think their view needs to be more user friendly. The UI makes it difficult to find things. Secondly, the configuration is very complex. JIRA should help people find out what configuration they are using."

More JIRA Portfolio Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing of the solution is expensive.""We only have nine people using it so we have a standard cost of $150 dollar per year. There are only additional costs if you exceed the limit of users, then you start paying by user. The cost is significantly higher.""The pricing continues to get higher.""The product is really not very expensive.""We pay our fees annually, although monthly payments are also available."

More JIRA Portfolio Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The integration is very good. We've more or less integrated with everything including reporting and registering.
Top Answer: The workflow needs improvement. The product itself could be improved in many ways, but at the moment I don't have anything very specific to discuss. It might be helpful to have a simple version of the… more »
Top Answer: We primarily use the solution for issue management.
Ranking
Views
5,575
Comparisons
4,884
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
503
Avg. Rating
8.7
Views
3,132
Comparisons
1,923
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
538
Avg. Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Portfolio for JIRA
Learn
GitLab
Atlassian
Overview

GitLab is a single application with features for the whole software development and operations (DevOps) lifecycle.

The agile portfolio management tool, built for JIRA.

With Portfolio for JIRA, you can plan and forecast a realistic roadmap, make data-informed decisions when the unexpected happens, and keep everyone in the know.

Offer
Learn more about GitLab
Learn more about JIRA Portfolio
Sample Customers
Siemens, University of Washington, Equinix, Paessler AG, CNCF, Ticketmaster, CERN, VaadinRosetta Stone, Sprint, UBS, Workday, Expedia, J.P. Morgan
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government7%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider15%
Retailer8%
Government6%
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. JIRA Portfolio and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
GitLab is ranked 6th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 5 reviews while JIRA Portfolio is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 13 reviews. GitLab is rated 8.6, while JIRA Portfolio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Provides or mandates quantitative code into the Master". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Good documentation, good visualization of tickets, and relatively stable". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Tekton, TeamCity, Bamboo and Harness, whereas JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, Smartsheet, Planview Enterprise One, Planview PPM Pro and Broadcom Clarity PPM. See our GitLab vs. JIRA Portfolio report.

See our list of best Enterprise Agile Planning Tools vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.