We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and Perimeter 81 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I can access the information whenever I want. It's integration is easy. The tool's GUI is easy to use with an IT background. The value benefits of using it include the ability to avoid storing data on local machines, reducing the risk of data loss"
"There is a certain accessibility feature that I can set using a cloud identity, which is really valuable to us."
"UI representation is the aspect I like the most about GCP, even more than Azure or AWS."
"It's reliable."
"The solution has many features for stability and security."
"I find the GCS Portal to be particularly valuable. It is more user-friendly and easier to navigate compared to other cloud providers, such as AWS. I particularly appreciate the user interface of GCS."
"If you have a good understanding of infrastructure, this solution is perfect."
"Scalability-wise, it is a great product."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →
"Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful."
"Perimeter 81 has increased my security and privacy while maintaining solid internet performance."
"The benefits are really built into the underlying protocol, however, Perimeter81 makes these available in a user-friendly way."
"Perimeter 81 is very pretty."
"The feature that I have found to be most valuable is the reputation that the company has regarding privacy. Nowadays, this is critical, especially when you do all of your work online."
"Scaling Perimeter 81 was easy to do."
"It helps to quickly get access to the pages I need."
"It has provided a seamless gateway to much-needed platforms."
"Stability-wise, the service could be improved."
"The storage capacity of the product is an area that can be improved if it is made possible to increase it whenever you want."
"The cost of licenses could be better."
"The UI of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The initial setup was quite complex."
"the documentation could be a bit better in terms of what is presented on the screen versus what actually happens."
"The solution's security should be improved."
"I think this product needs to shift the focus from our software, our solution, like social media analytics to our customers; not maintenance in the hardware."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →
"Its initial setup process is complex for a hybrid environment."
"Offering in-app explanations detailing what each feature does, its benefits and potential use cases can help users better understand and utilize the tool to its full potential."
"What would be useful would be a notification/warning that a session is due to timeout after exceeding the default connection limit."
"There are a few areas where the solution could be improved. For instance, we sometimes encounter connectivity issues, which can be problematic. Recently, I experienced a connectivity issue while trying to move to Azure. Connectivity issues can be quite frustrating."
"It would be nice to have a notification sound when Perimeter81 disconnects, as I sometimes don't notice when the icon shows that it's disconnected, and I end up wasting time waiting for my browser to load a page that shows an error, usually error 404."
"In the future, maybe P81 can improve the network traffic balancing and redundancy."
"The overall UI could be improved and updated to bring a simpler feel to the application."
"In order to have to bypass the login using the website, a good feature for Perimeter 81 to have is a login instance in the Perimeter 81 application. I'm using a Mac and we don't have that functionality."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 7th in ZTNA with 43 reviews while Perimeter 81 is ranked 3rd in ZTNA with 22 reviews. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4, while Perimeter 81 is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perimeter 81 writes "Great SAML and SCIM support with the ability to deploy site-2-site tunnels with specific IP restrictions". Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Cisco Duo, whereas Perimeter 81 is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cloudflare Access and Tailscale. See our Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy vs. Perimeter 81 report.
See our list of best ZTNA vendors and best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
