Compare Google Firebase vs. Microsoft Azure
Google Firebase is ranked 4th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 1 review while Microsoft Azure which is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 22 reviews. Google Firebase is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Azure is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Google Firebase writes "It has security rules to control database read/write operations in real-time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Puts the "scaffolding" in place and allows you to focus on the business solution". Google Firebase is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure and DigitalOcean, whereas Microsoft Azure is most compared with Oracle Cloud Platform, Google Firebase and SAP Cloud Platform.
Most Helpful Review | |||
| |||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon AWS vs. Microsoft Azure and other solutions. Updated: July 2019. 354,017 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
It has security rules to control database read/write operations in real-time. | The incorporation of several kinds of storage, such as SSD Premium, enhanced the performance of machines. Azure has improved my organization because it is a new technology and so the customers who don't have enough knowledge about the cloud delegate the administration of their cloud infrastructure to us. We incorporate and add a new service to our product lineup about how to manage their Azure. It impacts our business because we're able to incorporate this new service. Much more intuitive and more visual than AWS. More obvious where things are and how to change their configurations, etc. Being able to set up, change and configure VMs is easy - a lot easier than in AWS. Feedback and error messages make much more sense in Azure than in AWS. It was easy to deploy our applications on it. Azure has the best website amongst all cloud computing platforms. It is simple to utilize, and one can release nearly anything, from app services to host sites. I come from the DBA side so for me it's the easy maintenance; backups are very easy as well. |
Cons | |
Firebase uses JSON, and the storage format is very different to that of SQL. This does not allow for easy migrations. | Virtual networks might be improved by adding more rules for the validation of protocols and peripheral elements in security assurance. The interface is not easy to use. I'd like to see them develop a better interface, more graphical information about the resource and the consumer. There are a number of services offered by AWS that are not yet available on Azure. We have faced some challenges trying to deploy a new ESP application. Establishing the account in the beginning was very difficult. I would like to see more databases on the cloud, what they call today Big Data should be there. Scalability is definitely in need of improvement. Azure is a very good solution but it still lacks the performance of other cloud platforms. Azure does not handle scalability as well as its competitors. Sometimes a 10 percent increase in a server with 20 percent of CPU usage pushes the server up to 100 percent load, and you start having performance issues. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | It's a very expensive machine and I would like for them to improve the price. There are smaller sized competitors who offer cheaper prices. The pricing is very competitive. The cost-benefit equation for Azure is very good, particularly for small applications. However, Microsoft should do much, much more to improve how costs are communicated and how to forecast them. The Azure Pricing Calculator is not useful. Pricing is very difficult to guesstimate. With so many a la carte options and individual pricing it can be a hassle to understand. If you are not aware of costs, pricing, etc., you can end up with a hefty bill. However, I found that the Azure price calculator is a valuable tool to use before starting to deploy VMs in Azure. This tool will give you an overview of the costs you should expect on a monthly, quarterly or yearly basis. Several thousand dollars and counting, we haven't needed to upgrade on premises hardware (In fact we eliminated all of the old on-premises hardware and run 100% on Azure) or pay for it's maintenance, power etc. Keep to PaaS to gain the optimal benefits from an OPEX finance and resource perspective. It’s necessary to use third party products or to use good self-management economic tools |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs. 354,017 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 9,209 Comparisons 7,181 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 136 Avg. Rating 9.0 | Views 59,244 Comparisons 27,033 Reviews 22 Average Words per Review 491 Avg. Rating 8.7 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 50% of the time.  Compared 39% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time. |  Compared 20% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Windows Azure, Azure | |
Learn | |
| Google | Microsoft |
Overview | |
Information Not Available | Windows Azure is Microsoft's cloud platform where developers can create, deploy, and maintain their apps. This cloud application platform allows developers to concentrate on the actual applications, while it takes care of all the elements behind the apps. Windows Azure offers open across multiple frameworks,languages, and tools. It is fully scalable, localized in that it is hosted globally in many datacenters, and has widespread capabilities are, catering for all elements of application development, deployment, and management. Azure is comprised of several different service modules,including Infrastructure; Web; Mobile; Dev & Test; Big Data; Media;Storage, Backup & Recovery; and Identity & Access Management. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Google Firebase | Learn more about Microsoft Azure |
Sample Customers | |
| Fabulous, Pic Collage, Shazam, SkyScanner | BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor. |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Software R&D Company19% Retailer13% Healthcare Company6% Outsourcing Company6% Financial Services Firm14% Comms Service Provider13% Media Company12% Transportation Company8% |
See also Google Firebase Reviews, Microsoft Azure Reviews, and our list of Best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) Companies.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 27000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 27000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign In.