We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"I like many features, like the recently released useful analytics features. There are many from the data analytics or database side."
"AWS is easy to manage."
"The best features are flexibility and cost."
"The ease of use is the biggest benefit."
"The most valuable feature is that it is simple."
"The main reason why we use EC2 is because we are not dependent on maintaining the hardware inside our premises. Also, we have full control over the infrastructure, and we can modify it as per our own requirements."
"It is stable. For the cloud version, we require some installation platforms and we don't have a server with us right now. We require it from Amazon AWS. We can just plan and get the AWS server."
"I have found the trusted advisor tool works well, we are using it to get some insight into the security status and the processing of the applications."
"The most valuable aspect of Azure is the flexibility you have for all the services and solutions it offers, even if you use IaaS, PaaS, or SaaS, you have the option to only pay for the services you use."
"Azure allows us to bring applications to life quickly."
"The product has been quite stable."
"It comes with a lot of ready-made studies that we can connect with other existing Microsoft applications, for example, Office, Outlook, Chatline, and OneDrive. Everything is behind the scenes running with Azure. It's easy to build the connectors."
"In terms of computer resource management and reduced cost, it is very, very effective. In large environments, it gives you a lot of flexibility to provide different services, like disaster recovery and business continuity with simple and great options because you don't have to spend a lot of time for maintenance, upgrades, and security."
"Being cloud-based saves the provisioning aspect of an on-premises solution."
"There are plenty of functions available that we have used extensively. It is a complete platform of services."
"The user interface is very nice and makes everything easy to use."
"I don't have complaints. Previously, we asked for more end-to-end workshops, examples, and tutorials and these have been added and improved."
"The price could be better."
"The interface is relatively complex."
"The pricing could be a bit high at times. It's something they could improve upon."
"The solution could always be further improved on the commercial side of things. Amazon Web Services are not cheap. It would be ideal if it was less expensive for the customer."
"It would be ideal if they could provide automatic health reports. That way, I would be able to understand at a glance the state of my services at any given time."
"The pricing of the solution could be better. It's a little pricey."
"They could lower the cost. The setup could also be easier."
"It would be nice if there was an on-premises version of the solution, and it wasn't just cloud-based."
"Onboarding customers is a challenge. Sometimes our customers don't know how to deal with the cloud environment. Maybe the customers are more comfortable with the old-fashioned on-premise environment."
"The deployment was quite complex."
"The market place can be raised, and the CMT can be more sophisticated to create more opportunities for the end users."
"They should create integrations with more platforms."
"They should include a cybersecurity feature to improve the protection of the systems. They could do better in terms of the pricing model. Its price keeps on changing. Their technical support can also be better."
"Auto ML could be improved technically."
"The solution could improve by providing better tutorials and documentation."
"It could be cheaper, and Amazon could also be more transparent with its pricing. I would first expect any product vendor to give me the utmost transparency on pricing information. There shouldn't be any hidden costs. Their service offerings have a bit of segmentation, and they focus more on SMBs. They brought them onto the cloud and encouraged them to use solutions on the cloud. But strategically, they should probably improve that and offer some credits."
"It's an expensive product."
"We have a monthly subscription for Amazon AWS."
"Amazon AWS is really cost-effective."
"It's paid on a monthly basis and you have to pay for the resources that you use."
"The license for Amazon AWS is expensive. I am currently using the free version."
"Looking at the primary market for AWS, I see that there's a lot of customers who have only mid-level performance requirements, because you will have all these normal applications such as online auction websites, gaming applications, voice applications, and so on. These are not, for example, large monitoring applications, financial independents, or brick and mortar companies. So AWS caters to about 40% of the market when it comes to general applications. As it happens, in many cases, you simply don't need the high-performance offerings from AWS, nor the innovative products from Google Cloud Platform, which can come with large price tags."
"The price for AWS is good."
"With adequate knowledge, I think you can come up with a good model where the pricing won't be a constraint."
"The licensing fees are more than $1,000,000 USD annually."
"I believe that we have a three-year license, and I'm happy with the pricing."
"Pricing is comparable but from a cost perspective, this solution is the cheapest."
"It is affordable, but its subscription price could be cheaper."
"It's a pay-as-you-go subscription."
"Licensing fees are paid monthly."
"The price needs to be lower because they're competing with AWS."
Amazon Web Services (AWS), is a collection of cloud computing services, also called web services, that make up a cloud-computing platform offered by Amazon.com. These services operate from 12 geographical regions across the world. The most central and well-known of these services arguably include Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, also known as "EC2", and Amazon Simple Storage Service, also known as "S3". Amazon markets AWS as a service to provide large computing capacity more quickly and more cheaply than a client company building an actual physical server farm.
Windows Azure is Microsoft's cloud platform where developers can create, deploy, and maintain their apps. This cloud application platform allows developers to concentrate on the actual applications, while it takes care of all the elements behind the apps.
Windows Azure offers open across multiple frameworks,languages, and tools. It is fully scalable, localized in that it is hosted globally in many datacenters, and has widespread capabilities are, catering for all elements of application development, deployment, and management.
Azure is comprised of several different service modules,including Infrastructure; Web; Mobile; Dev & Test; Big Data; Media;Storage, Backup & Recovery; and Identity & Access Management.
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 126 reviews while Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 151 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Azure is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Flexible, scales well, and offers good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "This helps us meet multiple requirements other PaaS solutions do not but there is a lot of room for improvement". Amazon AWS is most compared with OpenShift, SAP Cloud Platform, IBM Public Cloud, Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Google App Engine, whereas Microsoft Azure is most compared with Oracle Cloud Platform, Google Firebase, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, IBM Public Cloud and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Amazon AWS vs. Microsoft Azure report.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.