We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Helix ALM enables users to build, make efficient and effective decisions, and use least-cost methods for maximum benefit, as fast as possible. They allow you to see and visualize your configuration."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."
"The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."
"It would be great to see Perforce's strategy is for implementing intelligence into the process via AI or ML. It's not clearly defined, at least not to my knowledge."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement."
"The data flow can be improved."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."
"I think that the pricing is quite good."
"The pricing is expensive."
TestTrack provides a centralized suite of capabilities for managing requirements, defects/issues and testing throughout the software development cycle.  This suite tracks everything involved in the software development process from feature requests and requirements to design revisions and actual changes in the code.  It keeps track of what tests were done, what was tested, who performed the test and when, on what platform, under which configuration and in what language.  TestTrack offers the ability to create, manage, and link artifacts from the beginning through the end of a design and development project  providing end-to-end traceability of all development artifacts  and giving managers a better handle on the shifting requirements that define their projects.  TestTrack enforces regulatory compliance to meet regulatory compliance requirements, including 21 CFR Part 11 and Sarbanes-Oxley.
Helix ALM is ranked 15th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 4th in Test Management Tools with 13 reviews. Helix ALM is rated 8.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Helix ALM writes "Helps you measure, automate, and visualize your processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Good integration between the management data and the test cases". Helix ALM is most compared with Jira, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Polarion Requirements, IBM Rational DOORS and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, HCL AppScan and Tricentis Tosca.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.