We performed a comparison between Apache JMeter and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."It is an open-source tool that is easy to use. It can be easily integrated with multiple tools, including Selenium."
"The solution is free. You don't need to worry about licensing costs."
"We really appreciate that the solution comes with a live community, which continuously provided plugins and support protocols."
"The thread groups, samplers, and listeners, which are all determined by the script's requirements, are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The solution helps by detecting bottlenecks."
"The most valuable features of Apache JMeter are user-friendliness, large resource, and the quality of assistance they provide. Additionally, it is easy to integrate with cloud platforms, such as AWS."
"This solution is very user-friendly, and allows for a lot of data capture when testing."
"It's a powerful tool that is open source."
"The most valuable features of Visual Studio Test Professional are the IntelliSense and the ease of adding the NuGet packages."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."
"The debugging feature is valuable."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."
"If JMeter could provide a web version of editing, that would be good."
"JMeter should be more stable. Every time there is a new release coming up, a lot of its older functionalities or the new functionalities that are brought in are not very well-documented. It should be documented properly, and there should be proper use cases."
"The solution needs more metrics for reporting."
"Currently, the integration pipeline is implemented by using Jenkins or a similar tool platform. These are continuous integration tools. As far as I know, integration is done by using custom scripts. It would be good if the integration with a continuous integration pipeline, like Jenkins or Hudson, can be done out of the box without using a script."
"The initial setup is complex and needs to be upgraded."
"The user interface is a little bit tricky."
"Until now, JMeter is not supporting most of the protocols."
"Report generation needs to be improved. It is quite difficult to get to."
"The price is reasonable, but it's not the best."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"The product must provide more automation."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
"Visual Studio Test Professional should include more automation."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"The performance could be faster."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Performance Testing Tools with 82 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "It's a free tool with a vast knowledge base, but the reporting is lackluster, and it has a steep learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Apache JMeter is most compared with BlazeMeter, Postman, Tricentis NeoLoad, OpenText LoadRunner Professional and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete, OpenText UFT One and TestRail.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
