Compare Apache JMeter vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
 |
Most Helpful Review | |||
| Use Visual Studio Test Professional? Share your opinion. | ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: December 2020. 454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
"Free" "I switched to Apache because it is free. Other tools are much too expensive and can cost up to $50,000 a year if you are looking at commercial options." "This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees." "This is an open-source product." "I was using the free version of the software." "In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free." | "For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person." "I think that the pricing is quite good." More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice » |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs. 454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Top Answer: When there's a high number of TPS I can achieve more transactions per seconds given the hyper-limitations. Top Answer: This is an open-source product. Top Answer: We have some scenarios for diameter load testing where TPS requirements are very high, 30K or 40K TPS. In the telco area, this is for simulating mobile usage. However, diameter load testing can be… more » | Top Answer: The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper.
Top Answer: I think that the pricing is quite good. Top Answer: The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable. The diagrammatic representation of the database in the entity framework is helpful but it seems to have been… more » |
Ranking  | |
Views 15,009 Comparisons 12,504 Reviews 14 Average Words per Review 483 Rating 7.6 | Views 3,288 Comparisons 2,684 Reviews 8 Average Words per Review 392 Rating 8.6 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 30% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time. |  Compared 15% of the time. Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| JMeter | |
Learn | |
| Apache | Microsoft |
Overview | |
Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types. | Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Apache JMeter | Learn more about Visual Studio Test Professional |
Sample Customers | |
| AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape | Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa |
Top Industries | |
Financial Services Firm33% Computer Software Company20% University7% Comms Service Provider7% Computer Software Company41% Comms Service Provider18% Financial Services Firm5% Media Company4% | Computer Software Company29% Manufacturing Company29% Transportation Company14% Healthcare Company14% Computer Software Company38% Comms Service Provider19% Financial Services Firm7% Insurance Company6% |
Company Size | |
Small Business24% Midsize Enterprise24% Large Enterprise53% | Small Business8% Midsize Enterprise15% Large Enterprise77% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: December 2020.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Apache JMeter is ranked 2nd in Performance Testing Tools with 15 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 10 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Good performance and easy to configure but could use better UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Good integration between the management data and the test cases". Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and LoadUI Pro, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Katalon Studio, Ranorex Studio and Neotys NeoLoad.
See our list of .
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.