We performed a comparison between Hyper-V and Oracle VM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Virtualization Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to configure."
"It utilizes the hardware so there are multiple applications running on one hypervisor."
"We chose this solution because of the pricing and the simplicity of the product."
"The most valuable features are ease of use, and it gets the job done in a straightforward manner."
"It is a very stable product. We have not had any issues with Hyper-V crashing itself."
"Hyper-V deployment is very user-friendly. It supports partial scripting and offers a UI for a smooth experience. There's also PowerShell scripting available for advanced users."
"I like that Hyper-V comes for free with Windows Server. You don't need to buy the license, and you only have to pay for the management aspect in System Center."
"I appreciate its stability and user-friendly management interface."
"It is simple and straightforward, and it will only require you one system integrator to do the job."
"In terms of server provisioning, it only takes a few clicks of a button and a bit of install automation."
"The solution is easy to use. You can spin one up when you need to and then shut it down."
"Ability to patch with no downtime."
"I rate Oracle VM's scalability a ten out of ten."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"VMware is user-friendly, with clear integration and detailed migration."
"What I like the most is the failover and the quick restore of virtual machines."
"VLAN is not very easy to configure."
"I would love to see other options for connecting VMs to large data storage."
"There are some storage problems which do occur in high load systems, especially SQL workloads."
"The biggest problem with Hyper-V is that the virtual machines are mostly running on top of the Windows Server, so we often need to reboot the machine and virtual machines when updating the host level. That's why we prefer VMware. It's much easier to patch the host. Also, Hyper-V has security vulnerabilities. It's easy to attack and compromise the host."
"The solution is heavily reliant on Microsoft's active directory for authentication, for coordination between nodes. Therefore, it inherits all the issues that are within the active directory."
"SCVMM needs to be more user-friendly. Without SCVMM, automating is not easy to use and we look forward to the upcoming versions of SCVMM becoming simpler and more admin friendly."
"Some of the interfaces need improvements, like the virtual switch or virtual VLAN interfaces."
"It would be nice if they provided a free management console that we could use to manage all of the hosts for no additional fee."
"The usage could be easier, and more user-friendly."
"Oracle VM should be more feature-rich."
"I've found that using Oracle VM is like stepping back in time. It's not kept up with technology. The only reason anyone uses it is that they're afraid of Oracle's licensing. Oracle has a tremendously bad licensing approach."
"There have been some security issues in the past."
"The solution needs more features and flexibility in terms of communicating with other platforms. If it had that, it would be the perfect product."
"There is no memory over-subscription and CPU over-subscription. That has to be improved in terms of Oracle VM perspective. The other leading virtualizing software solutions have this feature."
"There are currently issues with centralized storage."
"The user interface of the version that we have requires improvement. They have already improved the user interface in the latest version, but we are yet to migrate to that. The new UI is much better. I would like it to be simple. It is serving all of our needs, and I don't think it is necessary to keep adding. We are able to provision a VM in ten minutes, and provisioning it in five minutes will not have any added benefit."
Hyper-V is ranked 3rd in Server Virtualization Software with 134 reviews while Oracle VM is ranked 7th in Server Virtualization Software with 76 reviews. Hyper-V is rated 8.0, while Oracle VM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Hyper-V writes "It's a low-cost solution that enabled us to shrink everything down into a single server ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle VM writes "A cheap option available for Linux environments which is useful for many workloads". Hyper-V is most compared with VMware vSphere, VMware Workstation, Proxmox VE, Oracle VM VirtualBox and RHEV, whereas Oracle VM is most compared with VMware vSphere, KVM, Oracle VM VirtualBox, Proxmox VE and RHEV. See our Hyper-V vs. Oracle VM report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.