IBM Business Automation Workflow vs Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"IBM Business Automation Workflow provides a seamless streamlined collaboration within the organizations.""This is a low-code software where you can just drag and drop on the user interface. There are also a lot of quality integrations such as TMS.""It provides a solution for integration orchestration. This solution is for any organization in the banking, telecommunications, healthcare, manufacturing, and all domains and industries.""The most valuable feature is automation, which is quite strong and we are quite happy with it.""It is the only product that includes capture content management and a process suite, as well as rules in RPA.""The business process modeling is the most valuable feature.""IBM Business Automation Workflow is useful for helping us design custom user interfaces and processes we require.""The workflow of BAW's automation is handled inside of BPM, so we can see what state it is at and how things are processing through."

More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pros →

"Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management has good integration with all the other tools we have been using in our company. We use the data that other tools provide in our implementation.""Development is easy on the Ultimus platform."

More Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management Pros →

Cons
"The setup and installation process could be made easier.""I feel that the features are not user-friendly.""Improvements could be made in debugging and troubleshooting.""The main areas which need improvement are specifically around reporting and analytics.""One significant challenge is the lack of accessible forums or resources to seek help or information when problems arise.""Requires a lot of customization code writing which could be reduced.""IBM Business Automation Workflow could improve the integration.""The SCADA Systems are very sophisticated and have a hard time integrating with our older scales. The technical support in regards to the partner side needs some improvement."

More IBM Business Automation Workflow Cons →

"Ultimus is not good at handling cash transactions. They should add a mobile application in the next release.""We are looking for a feature that can resign and move the process from one step to another step."

More Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution has saved us time."
  • "There is still a relatively high total cost of ownership to actually implement, support, and stand up solutions."
  • "Nowadays, clients are looking at pricing as one of the major factors. For IBM products, they always think it is expensive for them. We are still educating our clients on the IBM FlexPoints licensing."
  • "When you compare with Laserfiche and M-Files, IBM is expensive."
  • "Licensing varies by use-case."
  • "IBM Business Automation Workflow has a flexible pricing mode, but the price is expensive. The price of the solution reflects the quality of the solution which is very high. The technical support is an additional cost."
  • "Our license is on a three-year term."
  • "It is on the expensive side, but it provides excellent supportability and an ecosystem that is proven to be a great fit for our organization."
  • More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Ultimus could stand to lower the price. Other tools are cheaper."
  • More Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We researched both IBM solutions and in the end, we chose Business Automation Workflow IBM BPM has a good user interface and the BPM coach is a helpful tool. The API is very useful in providing… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of IBM Business Automation Workflow is cost management.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    3,770
    Comparisons
    2,668
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    442
    Rating
    7.6
    Views
    182
    Comparisons
    116
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Business Automation Workflow
    Learn More
    Ultimus
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    IBM Business Automation Workflow combines business process management and case management capabilities in one workflow solution. It integrates the capabilities of business process and case management into a single workflow offering. It unites information, process, and users to provide a 360-degree view of work to drive more successful optimized business outcomes. IBM Business Automation Workflow on Cloud provides the same capabilities that are offered in the IBM Business Automation Workflow offering, all within a ready-to-use, cloud-based environment that is hosted in IBM Cloud data centers and managed by IBM.

    The Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management (BPM) Suite is a seamlessly integrated Business Process Management Software solution to manage the complete lifecycle of key business processes.

    Sample Customers
    Key Bank, Barclays, Control€xpert, MIR Insurance Brokers, Conqord Oil
    Ministry of Education Oman, Perdue Farms, MEG Energy Corp., The National and University Library, Unilever
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm64%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Engineering Company7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company7%
    Government7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is ranked 52nd in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6, while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management writes "Integrates well and helpful support". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, AWS Step Functions and IBM Case Foundation, whereas Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is most compared with Appian. See our IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.