Compare IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. IBM Rational ClearQuest

IBM Engineering Workflow Management is ranked 2nd in Software Configuration Management with 3 reviews while IBM Rational ClearQuest is ranked 4th in Software Configuration Management with 1 review. IBM Engineering Workflow Management is rated 7.0, while IBM Rational ClearQuest is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Engineering Workflow Management writes "Gives us work distribution among team members, but teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational ClearQuest writes "It can be adapted to any process flow". IBM Engineering Workflow Management is most compared with JIRA, TFS and Rally Software, whereas IBM Rational ClearQuest is most compared with IBM Rational ClearCase, JIRA and IBM Engineering Workflow Management.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CA (A Broadcom Company), IBM, Compuware and others in Software Configuration Management. Updated: November 2019.
379,605 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It puts all our source in one product. We know where to go to gather all our source code and which source is associated with which executable. It's a one-stop-shop, one place to go for everything.The developers can very easily see what has changed on a particular piece of source code or a program, and others can look at that as well so they can coordinate their changes. It makes it much easier to promote a piece of code up to production.We have been able to replicate entire SDLCs for new clients and have them loaded and ready to use Endevor in as little as one week. This was possible with the use of Endevor variables within the processors, so that a single processor was able to function for multiple systems across the entire SDLC.The approach of writing a single set of Endevor processors to work across multiple instances of the application (separate systems) made the processors fairly complex, but once you understand them, they are so powerful.Our automation, our development implementations are all automated, which is a huge amount of time savings.In the last year or so, we had a need to start using a CICS web services, and mesh them in with some distributed functions on an enterprise service bus. We put the web services into Endevor and we manage that way now.They've got plug-ins now to run it through Eclipse, they've got a lot of APIs, they handle UNIX files. I can't really think of any serious lack that they haven't addressed.It's very flexible. A new technology comes along, this can be multiplied to handle the new technology quite easily.

Read more »

Work distribution among team members and accountability for completion with a clearer picture.All of the features work together to provide a powerful holistic solution - from the dashboard all the way through to security.Agile templates give us a standard methodology for every Agile project. Also, the ability to create our own object types and linkages to features/epics allows us to enhance the verification of feature readiness.

Read more »

The combination of a highly flexible state machine together with a platform independent API enables possibilities to automate many steps that in many systems are manual.It can be adapted to any process flow and easily be integrated with other in-house tools using the ClearQuest API.

Read more »

Cons
One feature of Endevor is its Backout feature. If there is a problem, it can back out the executables. The only problem with that is that it will not back out the source in Endevor. For example, you can do a back out and it will back out the executable to the previous version, but it doesn't back out the source version in Endevor. It would make it much better if when you did a back out of Endevor, it would back out both the source and the executable and keep them in sync.Needs more audit capability when it comes to changes to settings that are made by administrators, as many of these are done through the panels and are therefore not logged as an action against a configuration item.Interfacing with some change control products that are not CA's, it's a little glitchy on the approvals of changes. It requires special needs for the users for approvals.There are a lot of screens in it. The process for moving out my other solutions, it could be more convenient. There are a lot of steps to go through and a lot of screens to go through to get it accomplished.They need to ditch the Eclipse plugin and just make the development environment for Z the standard Eclipse interface.​It is still kind of behind the times. It needs to catch up with all the millennials that want a distributed look and feel.​Learning the tool for the first time was extremely difficult, and it could be because of all the other processes we had around it. But knowing you can do these things in batch, you can do things in the foreground or online mode, and then these, you have to have a package for. There are these rules, and some of the concepts inside the tool are not clear, like what is the CCID? Why do I have to have one? What is that? And how is it used? As a developer, it's not important to me - I don't know what a CCID is, and I don't care - but apparently it's important to someone.Sometimes finding errors and output can be difficult because it spits out so many messages that it is hard to figure out which ones are the ones you need to look at and what flow did it actually take through the processor.

Read more »

Teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards along with plans.Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified.

Read more »

Lack of a modern web interface compared to other systems might discourage customers.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It's competitively priced and, as far as I know, it's just an enterprise license. We have found it is worth the money.It's worth the value. The pricing is fairly good, justifiable for the return on investment.Licensing is fairly simple, you don't need multiple licenses.Just make sure if you are going to license, ensure you license the right features.​

Read more »

Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition.It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
379,605 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
Endevor Software Change Manager, CA Software Change Manager for Mainframe, CA Endevor SCMIBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTCRational ClearQuest
Learn
CA (A Broadcom Company)
IBM
IBM
Overview
CA Endevor Software Change Manager (CA Endevor SCM) is the most widely used change management software for the mainframe environment. It can automate your entire development process, adapting to your specific business requirements and helping ensure consistency and complete control. Integration with IBM Rational Developer for System z can improve productivity, accelerate time-to-delivery and ensure the auditability of all programmer activities. Eclipse-ready, CA Endevor SCM helps shorten the learning curve for application developers. It provides your team with business-driven, customizable lifecycle paths and automated version control to protect your software assets and help maintain application integrity.

IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

IBM Rational ClearQuest is a fully customizable database workflow application development and production system. It provides flexible change and defect tracking, customizable processes, near real-time reporting and lifecycle traceability for better visibility and control of the software development lifecycle. IBM Rational ClearQuest provides scalable, multiplatform support to any size organization so you can continue to customize processes as your development needs evolve.

Offer
Learn more about CA Endevor Software Change Manager
Learn more about IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Learn more about IBM Rational ClearQuest
Sample Customers
Blue Hill Data Services Inc.Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS ITAtos SE, STM, Regence BlueCross BlueShield
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm56%
Insurance Company15%
Healthcare Company9%
Comms Service Provider6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company45%
Financial Services Firm29%
Software R&D Company16%
Healthcare Company2%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company18%
Manufacturing Company14%
Comms Service Provider13%
Software R&D Company9%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CA (A Broadcom Company), IBM, Compuware and others in Software Configuration Management. Updated: November 2019.
379,605 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email