Compare IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. TFS

IBM Engineering Workflow Management is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 2 reviews while TFS is ranked 1st in Test Management Tools with 10 reviews. IBM Engineering Workflow Management is rated 7.0, while TFS is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of IBM Engineering Workflow Management writes "Gives us work distribution among team members, but teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "Not just a source code repository, but a real and complete ALM solution". IBM Engineering Workflow Management is most compared with JIRA, TFS and Rally Software, whereas TFS is most compared with JIRA, Microsoft Azure DevOps and Micro Focus ALM. See our IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. TFS report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. TFS and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Work distribution among team members and accountability for completion with a clearer picture.Agile templates give us a standard methodology for every Agile project. Also, the ability to create our own object types and linkages to features/epics allows us to enhance the verification of feature readiness.

Read more »

It's an integrated system that includes all the information that we need to deliver our products smoothly and to track the progress of each piece of code.From the project management perspective, the tool is efficiently managing teams by giving management information, such as reports, graphs, velocity, capacity, etc.The biggest value-add is the solution integrates well with most Microsoft products.Build definitions and releases within the product. allow us to put our latest applications in the field.It has great functionality: work items, backlogs, source code, build releases, and it's easy to use.Complete integration with VS IDE and Office tools: This give us a possibility of high-level automation, thus minimizing human error.

Read more »

Cons
Teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards along with plans.

Read more »

The dashboard needs more enhancements.More options could be provided from the perspective of requirements management, which would help product owners to use the tool effectively.Since it is Microsoft, it is technology agnostic, thus it does not really fit into various different technologies in the organization.We are also using Microsoft Teams. The two products function separately. There is not enough collaboration between Microsoft Teams and TFS.TFS on-premise does not support integration with SharePoint Online.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition.It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements.

Read more »

It is pretty expensive compared to other project management tools.If running TFS on-premise is expensive, maybe you could consider moving to the Cloud and use the Visual Studio Team Services.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
5,664
Comparisons
4,087
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
313
Avg. Rating
7.0
1st
Views
27,597
Comparisons
23,191
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
309
Avg. Rating
8.7
Top Comparisons
Compared 53% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTCTeam Foundation Server
Learn
IBM
Microsoft
Overview

IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

Visual Studio Team Foundation Server (TFS) is the collaboration platform at the core of Microsoft's application lifecycle management (ALM) solution. TFS supports agile development practices, multiple IDEs and platforms locally or in the cloud and gives you the tools you need to effectively manage software development projects throughout the IT lifecycle.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Learn more about TFS
Sample Customers
Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS ITVendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm43%
Manufacturing Company14%
Software R&D Company10%
Retailer10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm16%
Manufacturing Company13%
Software R&D Company12%
Comms Service Provider8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise50%
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise61%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise86%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. TFS and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email