We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and nlyte based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Oracle and others in Enterprise Asset Management."Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met."
"It is configurable, where you can add extra fields to screens and to the database."
"There are not many enterprise asset management systems on the market and not many that have the categories that IBM Maximo has."
"The most valuable features of IBM Maximo are the overall power and interface, and there are a lot of different modules that we use that are helpful. Additionally, it's an integrated solution and it has a lot of capabilities."
"They have a real strength of tracking the asset itself along with the condition of the asset, the maintenance of the asset and who has access to the asset, etc."
"Reliable, very configurable, and it's all integrated in the same database."
"IBM Maximo is the best software for assets management."
"The Preventive Maintenance feature, especially in its inspection routines and KPI abilities, is valuable."
"The power management aspect of nlyte provides a comprehensive overview of power consumption and forecasting capabilities. It allows for strategic planning, such as assessing the impact of adding new racks with specific power requirements. This feature facilitates considerations not only for power consumption but also for thermal aspects, including airflow dynamics between hot and cold aisles. In essence, the most advantageous feature of nlyte sfor us lies in its power management capabilities."
"It was very slow due to the lagging issues. So that was kind of frustrating, considering how slow it was while functioning."
"The mobile solution has a lot of room for improvement, especially in geopositioning capabilities, tracking capabilities, and configuration capabilities, in order to let the tech operate online and offline."
"Although you can create notifications with Maximo, the configuration and options could be improved."
"It's not user-friendly. It could use shortcuts for frequently requested services."
"It needs full-service visibility. There are a lot of things that are hard for users to find out. For example, the Service Catalog is not too friendly. You really have to know what you're looking for."
"Coding can be complex when customization is required."
"The latest version is slow due to the power it requires."
"Vendor management needs enhancement."
"Nylte is quite intricate to use. Training someone to navigate the platform would likely require a substantial investment, ranging from one to two months for basic proficiency, followed by an additional two to three months of consistent use to gain full proficiency. Despite its complexity, I believe there is room for simplification, making it more user-friendly. While there have been improvements, there is potential for further enhancements in this area."
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management with 23 reviews while nlyte is ranked 10th in Data Center Infrastructure Management with 1 review. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while nlyte is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of nlyte writes "A Software Solution synchronizing information and activities to other systems that depend on accurate physical infrastructure information". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, NetSuite ERP and IFS Cloud Platform, whereas nlyte is most compared with Schneider Electric EcoStruxure IT, Device42 and Sunbird DCIM.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.