IBM Rational Quality Manager vs OpenText Silk Performer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
133 views|68 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
820 views|482 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Quality Manager and OpenText Silk Performer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Load Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Integration with the other professional tools is a very strong advantage, so that we can have a traceability between the requirements and defects in Rational Team Concert. That's the most important aspect.""The one feature that has not allowed us to switch to any other solution is the integration with functional testing.""Reusability and integration capabilities which make it a great choice for organizations that use a variety of development tools and platforms.""Latest features include versioning of testings which can be great when used for multiple releases of a product.""The most valuable feature is the RFT because it allows us to automate manual test cases.""It's very reliable as a solution.""RQM is something that we use everyday, so it has to be up and running, otherwise we would lose everything.""RQM's best features are integration with test automation and performance testing."

More IBM Rational Quality Manager Pros →

"A good monitoring tool, simple to script and easy to configure."

More OpenText Silk Performer Pros →

Cons
"I think it's fine from a performance perspective but usability is something that needs improvement.""Adding support for uploading a collection of test cases would be a helpful addition.""While RQM allows for running tests and viewing results, it could be further enhanced in terms of performance and speed.""Integration capabilities with other vendors' tools should improve.""It would be helpful if we could assign a hierarchy to a group of test cases.""RQM could be improved by adding a feature that allows test requirements to be selected when creating a task plan.""Mainly Quality Assurance and DevOps, but of course the whole company and management areas with more knowledge of quality and client success approach.""Currently, the user interface needs to be more user-friendly."

More IBM Rational Quality Manager Cons →

"If you have a large amount of data, the solution can struggle."

More OpenText Silk Performer Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licenses of these tools (the whole CLM package) is very costly as compared to other vendors' tools."
  • "Each license includes 12 months of customer support. A free 90-day trial of the software is also available."
  • More IBM Rational Quality Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The one feature that has not allowed us to switch to any other solution is the integration with functional testing.
    Top Answer:IBM Rational has the RFT, which is rational functional testing. We do test automation with rational functional testing. So after we do that, we can put in all the code, then I can build it, then put… more »
    Top Answer:We create test cases, and then we need to plan a new task plan feature from the existing task case file and execute the test results, which will be saved in RQM. So that is how we are using the tool… more »
    Top Answer:A good monitoring tool, simple to script and easy to configure.
    Top Answer:I think the cost is on the higher side when compared to some of the newer tools. You can't really compare this with other tools because some of the newer ones are not as feature-rich and as easy to… more »
    Top Answer:In terms of areas of improvement, I would say the Silk Performance Explorer tool, which is used for monitoring and analysis, can be improved because that's where we spend most of our time when we're… more »
    Ranking
    15th
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    133
    Comparisons
    68
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    383
    Rating
    8.3
    11th
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    820
    Comparisons
    482
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    621
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rational Quality Manager
    Micro Focus Silk Performer, Silk Performer
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Rational Quality Manager is a next-generation web-based collaboration tool that provides test artifact management, construction, and planning throughout the entire development process. IBM Rational Quality Manager is based on IBM’s successful Jazz™ platform and derives many of its popular intuitive features from Jazz™.

    IBM Rational Manager was developed for every type of test team in the marketplace today. Every role is included, such as test manager, test architect, lab manager, tester, and test lead. The solution is also able to include various roles outside the established test organization.

    IBM Rational Quality Manager Features and Benefits:

    • Customizable design and construction: Users can easily define the overall design for each and every test case. Every test case contains a robust text editor, which can include background data concerning the test case. Test cases can include links to developmental requirements and items. They can also include test artifacts, such as test scripts, test case execution processes, and test plans. Test cases can also be integrated with test suites.

    • Intuitive reporting: IBM Rational Quality Manager provides an intuitive set of predefined reports to ensure users get comprehensive status on all projects. Additional customized reports can be made available by using the Development Intelligence or Rational Insight features for more precise reporting. Users can view live test execution status and are also able to discover the relationship between test artifacts, development artifacts, and requirements in the traceability view.

    • Exhaustive test planning processes: Users define and customize test plans that will drive all activity for the organization's teams through every component of the project’s lifecycle. Everything is developed around the concept of: “ Is this ready for release?” The test plan defines the project scope and test effort, and contains the key indicators so all team members will understand the desired outcomes.

      Top test plan tasks include (but are not limited to):

      • Definition of test and business objectives.
      • Evaluate the size of the test effort.
      • Define different environments to test and develop test configurations.
      • Develop entrance criteria, exit criteria, and overall quality goals.
      • Create a review and approval process for the test plan and/or individual test cases.
      • View Real-time Test Progress

    • Collaboration made easy: Users can easily share data with other members of the team with the Collaboration Lifecycle Management (CLM). Team members can also assign tasks and view each other's progress. They can also distribute work for review and track the input and status of each reviewer. There is also the ability to lock artifacts to prevent others from editing a completed piece.

    • Security: IBM Rational Quality Manager can protect against attack threats and data breaches with the IBM AppScan Tester. This can help achieve higher quality and more secure applications with greater positive outcomes at a very reasonable competitive cost.

    • Governance: The solution will ensure that an organization’s business processes are in compliance with department, corporate, industry, regional, and government regulations and standards. IBM Rational Quality Manager will correlate test processes and create suitable records of testing results and project history to comply with any auditing process.

    Test Asset reusability for performance monitoring
    Silk Performer can considerably speed up testing cycles by allowing you to reuse your existing functional tests. Use Silk Test® or Selenium for performance testing and synthetic monitoring purposes as well.

    Cloud in
    Integrated scalability from the Cloud
    Silk Performer load testing enables your applications for 'battle readiness' that can withstand massive, global usage. Easily simulate any size peak-load and avoid costly investments in stress testing hardware and setup.

    Retina scan
    Monitor user experience with advanced diagnostics
    Detect, isolate, and resolve performance issues with effective end-to-end diagnostics. Design scripts to uncover errors from the user’s perspective and analyze results with easy to read visual reporting.

    Monitor
    A leading web support for load and stress testing
    Validate performance of your most complex web applications and efficiently create comprehensive tests that reflect real world conditions and usage patterns.

    Comprehensive mobile performance testing
    Lower the cost and complexity of testing mobile web and mobile native applications at scale. Silk Performer provides a complete set of profiles for all popular mobile devices, application types, and connection speeds.

    Sample Customers
    Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, Barr
    University of Colorado, Medidata, Monash University
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government43%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Transportation Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company19%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Government9%
    Insurance Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Load Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 15th in Load Testing Tools with 11 reviews while OpenText Silk Performer is ranked 11th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review. IBM Rational Quality Manager is rated 7.6, while OpenText Silk Performer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Scalable and Stable solution with good integration function and support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Silk Performer writes "Scripting and basic test executions are good features; configuring the workload for tests is easy". IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center, TestRail, Zephyr Enterprise and Tricentis qTest, whereas OpenText Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise.

    See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.