Compare IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. Silk Performer

IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 10th in Load Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Silk Performer is ranked 23rd in Load Testing Tools. IBM Rational Quality Manager is rated 7.6, while Silk Performer is rated 0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Has good integration with the other professional tools but usability needs improvement ". On the other hand, IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Zephyr Enterprise and TestRail by Gurock, whereas Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: May 2020.
418,350 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
418,350 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
10th
out of 24 in Load Testing Tools
Views
1,603
Comparisons
955
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
499
Avg. Rating
7.5
23rd
out of 24 in Load Testing Tools
Views
50
Comparisons
34
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Quality Manager
Learn
IBM
Micro Focus
Video Not Available
Overview
IBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.

Test Asset reusability for performance monitoring
Silk Performer can considerably speed up testing cycles by allowing you to reuse your existing functional tests. Use Silk Test® or Selenium for performance testing and synthetic monitoring purposes as well.

Cloud in
Integrated scalability from the Cloud
Silk Performer load testing enables your applications for 'battle readiness' that can withstand massive, global usage. Easily simulate any size peak-load and avoid costly investments in stress testing hardware and setup.

Retina scan
Monitor user experience with advanced diagnostics
Detect, isolate, and resolve performance issues with effective end-to-end diagnostics. Design scripts to uncover errors from the user’s perspective and analyze results with easy to read visual reporting.

Monitor
A leading web support for load and stress testing
Validate performance of your most complex web applications and efficiently create comprehensive tests that reflect real world conditions and usage patterns.

Comprehensive mobile performance testing
Lower the cost and complexity of testing mobile web and mobile native applications at scale. Silk Performer provides a complete set of profiles for all popular mobile devices, application types, and connection speeds.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager
Learn more about Silk Performer
Sample Customers
Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, Barr
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company47%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government12%
Healthcare Company8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: May 2020.
418,350 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.