IBM Rational Quality Manager Pros and Cons

IBM Rational Quality Manager Pros

Setembrino Lusa
Engenheiro de Software - DevOps - Agile - Application Lifecycle Management Practice Specialist at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Reusability and integration capabilities which make it a great choice for organizations that use a variety of development tools and platforms.
View full review »
Shuchita Tripathi
Senior Analyst at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Latest features include versioning of testings which can be great when used for multiple releases of a product.
View full review »
TestLead3776
Test Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
It allows user to add whichever widget (predefined) based on the need. It has integration with CCM and RM to achieve traceability.
View full review »

IBM Rational Quality Manager Cons

Setembrino Lusa
Engenheiro de Software - DevOps - Agile - Application Lifecycle Management Practice Specialist at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Mainly Quality Assurance and DevOps, but of course the whole company and management areas with more knowledge of quality and client success approach.
View full review »
Shuchita Tripathi
Senior Analyst at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Integration capabilities with other vendors' tools should improve.
View full review »
TestLead3776
Test Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Organizing the test cases is tedious. There is no mechanism to keep and maintain the test cases as hierarchy. This should be seriously addressed.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Micro Focus, Gurock and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: July 2019.
352,552 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email