Compare IBM Rational Quality Manager vs. SpecFlow

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the RFT because it allows us to automate manual test cases.
Top Answer: Adding support for uploading a collection of test cases would be a helpful addition. As it is now, we cannot upload a set of test cases, and instead, have to create it manually. Being able to upload… more »
Top Answer: We are a consultancy and we use this solution to create a testing plan, that includes test cases, for our clients. It is part of a larger suite of tools that includes Rational Functional Tester, which… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
14th
Views
1,339
Comparisons
735
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
7.7
24th
Views
333
Comparisons
159
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Quality Manager
SpecFlow+
Learn More
Overview
IBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.

SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager
Learn more about SpecFlow
Sample Customers
Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, Barr
Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider16%
Manufacturing Company14%
Financial Services Firm10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Healthcare Company10%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: May 2021.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools with 3 reviews while SpecFlow is ranked 24th in Test Management Tools. IBM Rational Quality Manager is rated 7.6, while SpecFlow is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Has good integration with the other professional tools but usability needs improvement ". On the other hand, IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TestRail by Gurock, Tricentis qTest, TFS and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, whereas SpecFlow is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, TestRail by Gurock and Zephyr Enterprise.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.