• Home
  • IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. PractiTest

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs PractiTest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo

IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Read 14 IBM Engineering Workflow Management reviews
747 views|306 comparisons
64% willing to recommend
PractiTest Logo

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews
257 views|193 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. PractiTest
July 2019
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Engineering Workflow Management and PractiTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. PractiTest Report (Updated: July 2019).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Suvajit Chakraborty
Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement
Nirmal Kumar Chaturvedi
Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization
Since we started using this product, our organization's testing functionality has really improved. We easily trace requirements and maintain the... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Traceability reporting is inbuilt and includes all your requirements.""We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.""Good for managing stories, sprints, hydration and releases.""All of the features work together to provide a powerful holistic solution - from the dashboard all the way through to security.""Agile templates give us a standard methodology for every Agile project. Also, the ability to create our own object types and linkages to features/epics allows us to enhance the verification of feature readiness.""Work distribution among team members and accountability for completion with a clearer picture."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

More PractiTest Pros →

Cons
"The solution is very heavily vendor dependent.""Lacks ability to customize and reporting can be slow.""Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified.""We have encountered issues with stability. We have seen where the entire system kind of goes for a toss when certain people use certain types of queries, which are very costly. Then the system kind of slows down a bit, and we have to monitor it.""Teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards along with plans."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Cons →

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

More PractiTest Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition."
  • "It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements."
  • "It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. The cost per token is around $115-$120."

    • More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

    • More PractiTest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
    Top Answer:We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering W...
    Top Answer:Customers need to pay for a license to use this product. It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. We have about 7,800 tokens, and including maintenance… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use… more »
    Read all 6 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    10th
    out of 19 in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
    Views
    747
    Comparisons
    306
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,076
    Rating
    7.0
    20th
    out of 35 in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    Views
    257
    Comparisons
    193
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    PractiTest
    Overview

    IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

    Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

    Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
    • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
    • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
    • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
    • Release your products with confidence and control.


    Sample Customers
    Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
    Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company22%
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise80%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise57%
    Large Enterprise14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. PractiTest
    July 2019
    Free Report: IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. PractiTest
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. PractiTest and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Engineering Workflow Management is ranked 10th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 14 reviews while PractiTest is ranked 20th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. IBM Engineering Workflow Management is rated 6.8, while PractiTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of IBM Engineering Workflow Management writes "Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". IBM Engineering Workflow Management is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Codebeamer, GitLab and Polarion ALM, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Zephyr Enterprise, Jira and Microsoft Azure DevOps. See our IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. PractiTest report.

    We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.