Compare No Magic MagicDraw vs. iGrafx

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
33,629 views|21,833 comparisons
iGrafx Logo
3,395 views|2,022 comparisons
No Magic MagicDraw Logo
6,768 views|3,402 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about No Magic MagicDraw vs. iGrafx and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill.""For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly.""We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users.""I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.""The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.""The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.""When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.""The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."

More Camunda BPM Pros »

"This product fulfills ninety percent of our needs, and we're happy as users of it.""Another good feature is that the numbering of the shapes in iGrafx is much easier and more convenient, in comparison to what is found in Visio. So far I haven't found anything similar to what I have with iGrafx, in that regard.""Finding the right symbol and creating links, horizontal and vertical are the features I use."

More iGrafx Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the ability to quickly build multiple layers within the organizational and business process environments, as well as in the SysML product environments, and converting to files that can be accessed by clients who do not have a system and a teamwork server access.""The most valuable features are the workflow, the workflow drawing, block diagrams, and team sharing, where everyone can work together.""The technical support is very good.""When you look at it, No Magic is an all-encompassing tool. You can use it for business architecture design. You can use it for deploying an ERP system across your enterprise. However, it was initially designed and developed for model-based systems engineering. That's the systems engineering required to either produce an IP system or product. It takes away the mounds of paper and puts it into a model. It enables you to generate significant savings by modeling that new product or that system before you ever start developing a prototype.""The most valuable feature is the amount of flexibility that one has to model, which is great for an individual.""The most valuable features are the visibility, standard compliance, and interface."

More No Magic MagicDraw Pros »

Cons
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI.""The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options.""When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved.""I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.""The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself.""I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.""I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.""I would also like a very easy to use form builder."

More Camunda BPM Cons »

"It would be helpful to be able to do more analytics and generate reports on historical documents that have already been uploaded to the server.""Dragging and dropping shapes is not as user-friendly as in Visio. In Visio, it's very easy to work with shapes and in very few minutes you can plot a whole, multi swim-lane, cross-functional process.""In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet."

More iGrafx Cons »

"I would like to see the ability to deploy live business process models and capture real-time data (without the need for another product tool) so you don't have to be dependent on other products for this functionality.""I have a technical issue in not knowing how to share the information with a client.""The cost of upgrading the product should be lower.""There's lots of documentation. They process multiples of guides. They've got all kinds of guides and documentation out there, but it's kind of hard to find. There are a lot of videos. You can go to YouTube and find videos on how it's been used in different ways, but it just kind of scratches the surface.""When I am working with my Mac and I right-click to copy and paste, it doesn't work.""It's very focused on specific modern languages and it doesn't do necessarily general systems software engineering with diagrams. They should expand the diagram types for the languages."

More No Magic MagicDraw Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.""We are using the open-source version of this solution.""Camunda is much cheaper.""I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."

More Camunda BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive."

More iGrafx Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This solution is expensive.""In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades.""I would say licensing would be anywhere from $3,500 to $6,500 per person or per seat (it's a per seat style license)."

More No Magic MagicDraw Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.
442,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are… more »
Top Answer: It's free, open-source. I use the open-source free version.
Top Answer: Hi dear knauf its pleasure to see you in a good position, you were always in the top of specialist. your advise and… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable features are the visibility, standard compliance, and interface.
Top Answer: In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades.
Top Answer: It's very focused on specific modern languages and it doesn't do necessarily general systems software engineering with… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
MagicDraw
Learn
camunda
iGrafx
Dassault
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation
iGrafx business process management and analysis solutions empower organizations to achieve maximum performance. iGrafx captures and communicates the alignment of strategy, people, processes and technology, and unites the entire organization around delivering business value. iGrafx delivers strategic and operational decision support to enable our customers to become and remain world class competitors.MagicDraw is the award-winning business process, architecture, software and system modeling tool with teamwork support. Designed for Business Analysts, Software Analysts, Programmers, QA Engineers, and Documentation Writers, this dynamic and versatile development tool facilitates analysis and design of Object Oriented (OO) systems and databases.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about iGrafx
Learn more about No Magic MagicDraw
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentMultinational BankNorthrop Grumman, Labcorp, Deposco, ClearView Training, IT Services Promotion Agency, Intelligent Chaos, Metalithic Systems Inc., Sodifrance
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Comms Service Provider25%
Non Profit17%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company6%
REVIEWERS
Consumer Goods Company29%
Comms Service Provider29%
Engineering Company14%
Pharma/Biotech Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm11%
Media Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company9%
Government8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business48%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise36%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise69%
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise45%
Large Enterprise36%
REVIEWERS
Small Business89%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Find out what your peers are saying about No Magic MagicDraw vs. iGrafx and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.
iGrafx is ranked 18th in Business Process Design with 3 reviews while No Magic MagicDraw is ranked 11th in Business Process Design with 6 reviews. iGrafx is rated 7.0, while No Magic MagicDraw is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of iGrafx writes "Provides comprehensive way to connect workflow and cross-feed documents, but needs support for multi-page processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of No Magic MagicDraw writes "Great for model-based engineering with lots of excellent features and good technical support". iGrafx is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPM, Bizagi and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, whereas No Magic MagicDraw is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio, Visual Paradigm and IBM System Architect. See our No Magic MagicDraw vs. iGrafx report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.